Volume 8, Issue 3 (1-2023)
SJNMP 2023, 8(3): 31-46 |
Back to browse issues page
Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
Abadian L, Adib-Hajbaghery M. A comparative study of Iran's undergraduate nursing education system with Manchester University, England in 2022. SJNMP 2023; 8 (3) :31-46
URL: http://sjnmp.muk.ac.ir/article-1-520-en.html
URL: http://sjnmp.muk.ac.ir/article-1-520-en.html
1- Trauma Nursing Research Center, Faculty of Nursing, Kashan University of Medical Sciences, Kashan, Iran
2- Trauma Nursing Research Center, Faculty of Nursing, Kashan University of Medical Sciences, Kashan, Iran ,adib1344@yahoo.com
2- Trauma Nursing Research Center, Faculty of Nursing, Kashan University of Medical Sciences, Kashan, Iran ,
Abstract: (834 Views)
Background & Aim: For the nursing bachelor's degree to be more successful in Iran and to identify the strengths and weaknesses of its curriculum, it is necessary to conduct comparative studies and benefit from the experiences and strategies experienced in successful universities. This study aimed to compare the Iranian undergraduate nursing curriculum with the University of Manchester, UK.
Material & Methods: The present study is a comparative descriptive study that was performed using George Brady four-step model including description, interpretation, proximity, and comparison. The details provided from the Iranian bachelor's nursing curriculum are taken from the website of the Ministry of Health in Iran and the University of Manchester.
Results: In the field of goals and mission in Iran, courses, content and educational methods are different from Manchester. The philosophy is more clearly expressed in the Manchester curriculum. In terms of student admission, both are different. Curriculum content in Iran is somewhat inconsistent between the courses offered and their content with educational goals. While at the University of Manchester, the content of the curriculum is selected, organized and compiled in such a way that the goals of the curriculum are realized. Examining and comparing expected job positions for nursing experts is different from Iran.
Conclusion: The comparison of the nursing education system of Iran and England showed that the education system of our country has weak and strong points. It seems that using the experiences of this country and its indigenization will help to improve the nursing education system of Iran.
Material & Methods: The present study is a comparative descriptive study that was performed using George Brady four-step model including description, interpretation, proximity, and comparison. The details provided from the Iranian bachelor's nursing curriculum are taken from the website of the Ministry of Health in Iran and the University of Manchester.
Results: In the field of goals and mission in Iran, courses, content and educational methods are different from Manchester. The philosophy is more clearly expressed in the Manchester curriculum. In terms of student admission, both are different. Curriculum content in Iran is somewhat inconsistent between the courses offered and their content with educational goals. While at the University of Manchester, the content of the curriculum is selected, organized and compiled in such a way that the goals of the curriculum are realized. Examining and comparing expected job positions for nursing experts is different from Iran.
Conclusion: The comparison of the nursing education system of Iran and England showed that the education system of our country has weak and strong points. It seems that using the experiences of this country and its indigenization will help to improve the nursing education system of Iran.
Type of Study: Research |
Subject:
Special
Received: 2023/01/1 | Revised: 2023/02/15 | Accepted: 2023/01/30 | Published: 2023/01/30 | ePublished: 2023/01/30
Received: 2023/01/1 | Revised: 2023/02/15 | Accepted: 2023/01/30 | Published: 2023/01/30 | ePublished: 2023/01/30
References
1. Rassouli M, Zagheri Tafreshi M, Esmaeil M. Challenges in clinical nursing education in Iran and strategies. Journal of clinical excellence. 2014;2(1):11-22. [Persian]
2. Shahla A. Developing and standardization of quality evaluation and accreditation indicators for curricula of baccalaureate degree nursing education in Iran. Annals of Military and Health Sciences Reserch. 2012;10(1):50-61. [Persian]
3. Salminen L, Stolt M, Saarikoski M, Suikkala A, Vaartio H, Leino-Kilpi H. Future challenges for nursing education-A European perspective. Nurse education today. 2010;30(3):233-8. [DOI:10.1016/j.nedt.2009.11.004]
4. Reisi N, Raeissi P, Sokhanvar M, Kakemam E. The impact of accreditation on nurses' perceptions of quality of care in Iran and its barriers and facilitators. The International journal of health planning and management. 2019;34(1):e230-e40. [DOI:10.1002/hpm.2642]
5. Karimi MH, Khorashadizadeh F. Nursing curriculum in some developed countries and proposed way of applying it in the Iranian nursing curriculum A comparative study. 2015;4(2):38-47. [Persian]
6. Derakhshanfard S, Jokar F, Ehsanpour S, Hadadgar A. Evaluation of the doctoral program in medical education of Isfahan University of Medical Sciences based on the CIPP model. Journal of Education and Health Promotion. 2022;11(1):217. [DOI:10.4103/jehp.jehp_536_21]
7. Sadat-Aghahosseini S, Navab E, Sadooghiasl A. A comparative study on curriculum of geriatric nursing master's degree in Iran and Ireland. Nursing Practice Today. 2016;3(1):19-25.
8. Kermanshahi S, Memarian R, Heseni A, Zamzam S, Nezamli F. A comparison post-graduate MS curriculum of nursing education in Iran and Canada. Journal of medical education development. 2011;4(6):48-54. [Persian]
9. Nikfarid L, Ashktorab T. Understanding of neonatal intensive care nurse practitioner students of situation of their profession in Iran: A qualitative study. A qualitative study IJNR. 2013;8(29):37-46. [Persian]
10. Ghorbani F, Rahkar Farshi M. Comparison of Master's curriculum of pediatric nursing in Iran and United states. J Nurs Educ (Jne). 2015;4(3):41-47. [Persian]
11. Borzuo SR, Tehrani H, Nooreddini A. Comparative study of nursing program in Iran and Australia: A descriptive-comparative study. Journal of Nursing Education. 2021;10(3):66-76. [Persian]
12. Adib HM, Mazhariazad F. Nursing Bachelor's Education program in Iran and UCLA: A comparative study. Military Caring Sciences. 2019;6(6):159-68. [Persian] [DOI:10.29252/mcs.6.2.159]
13. Ebadi NZ, Nobahar M, Babamohamadi H. Comparison Of Master's Degree Curriculum For Pediatric Nursing In Iran And King Of England: A Comparative Study. Iranian Journal of Pediatric Nursing. 2020;6(3):9-22. [Persian]
14. Chang C-Y, Gau M-L, Tang K-Y, Hwang G-J. Directions of the 100 most cited nursing student education research: A bibliometric and co-citation network analysis. Nurse Education Today. 2021;96:104645. [DOI:10.1016/j.nedt.2020.104645]
15. Rafferty AM. Nurses as change agents for a better future in health care: the politics of drift and dilution. Health Economics, Policy and Law. 2018;13(3-4):475-91. [DOI:10.1017/S1744133117000482]
16. Hinds Z, Lockwood P. A cross-sectional student survey of the impact of the Covid-19 lockdowns on clinical placement in England. Radiography. 2023;29(1):190-9. [DOI:10.1016/j.radi.2022.11.006]
17. Williams-Brown Z, Hodkinson A, Jopling M. Mission impossible: inclusive teaching in a standards-driven system. Education 3-13. 2023:1-13. [DOI:10.1080/03004279.2022.2155066]
18. Moonaghi HK, Valizadehzare N, Khorashadizadeh F. PhD programs in nursing in Iran and Canada: A qualitative study. JPMA The Journal of the Pakistan Medical Association. 2017;67(6):863-68.
19. Roux G, Halstead J. Issues and trends in nursing: Essential knowledge for today and tomorrow: Jones & Bartlett Publishers; 2009.
20. Walsby O. Implementing a reading list strategy at The University of Manchester-determination, collaboration and innovation. Insights. 2020;33(1):1-9. [DOI:10.1629/uksg.494]
21. Marquini GV, De Jarmy Di Bella ZI, Sartori MG. The Manchester‐Fothergill technique: Browsing in the cutting‐edge art gallery. International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics. 2022;156(1):10-6. [DOI:10.1002/ijgo.13706]
22. Mokhtari Nouri J, Nezamzadeh M. Comparative study of nursing education in Iran and Japan. Clinical Excellence. 2016;4(2):81-99. [Persian]
23. Stress PIUH. The University Of Manchester.
24. Farsi Z, Nasiri M, Sajadi SA, Khavasi M. Comparison of Iran's nursing education with developed and developing countries: a review on descriptive-comparative studies. Bmc Nursing. 2022;21(1):1-19. [DOI:10.1186/s12912-022-00861-x]
25. Baghaei R, Mihandoust S, Hosseinzadegan F, Mokhtari L. Comparison of the curriculum of undergraduate nursing education in Iran, Turkey and Jordan. J Educ Ethics Nurs. 2018;7(1&2):21-32. [Persian] [DOI:10.52547/ethicnurs.7.1.2.363]
26. Finch ML, Wilson DR, Symonds K, Floyd-Tune K. Being interviewed for admission to a BSN program: A qualitative inquiry. Advances in Nursing. 2014;2014. [DOI:10.1155/2014/310143]
27. Mohammadi S, Yazdan Nik AR, Yousefy A. A glimpse in the challenges in Iranian academic nursing education. Iranian Journal of Medical Education. 2014;14(4):323-31. [Persian]
28. Farsi Z, Dehghan‐Nayeri N, Negarandeh R, Broomand S. Nursing profession in Iran: an overview of opportunities and challenges. Japan journal of nursing science. 2010;7(1):9-18. [DOI:10.1111/j.1742-7924.2010.00137.x]
29. Blaauw D, Ditlopo P, Rispel LC. Nursing education reform in South Africa-lessons from a policy analysis study. Global health action. 2014;7(1):26401. [DOI:10.3402/gha.v7.26401]
30. Awadhalla M, Al-Mohandis B, Al-Darazi F. Transformation of nursing education: the experience of Bahrain. Eastern Mediterranean Health Journal. 2018;24(9):959-64. [DOI:10.26719/2018.24.9.959]
Send email to the article author
| Rights and permissions | |
 |
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. |
