Volume 8, Issue 3 (1-2023)
SJNMP 2023, 8(3): 101-113 |
Back to browse issues page
Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
Maleki M, hasheminasab L, shahoei R, Mansoori K, Raeisi A, Zaheri F. Investigating the Rate of birth Satisfaction and its Relationship with Perceived Stress in Pregnant Women Admitted in Hospital Shahrekord, 2022. SJNMP 2023; 8 (3) :101-113
URL: http://sjnmp.muk.ac.ir/article-1-528-en.html
URL: http://sjnmp.muk.ac.ir/article-1-528-en.html
Mitra Maleki1 
, Leila Hasheminasab2 , Roonak Shahoei3 , Kamyar Mansoori4 , Ahmad Raeisi5 , Farzaneh Zaheri * 6
, Leila Hasheminasab2 , Roonak Shahoei3 , Kamyar Mansoori4 , Ahmad Raeisi5 , Farzaneh Zaheri * 6
1- Student Research Committee, School of Nursing and Midwifery, Kurdistan University of Medical Sciences, Sanandaj, Iran
2- Department of midwifery, Clinical Care Research Center, Research Institute for Health Development, School of Nursing and Midwifery, Kurdistan University of Medical Sciences, Sanandaj, Iran
3- Department of Midwifery, Clinical Care Research Center, Research Institute for Health Development, School of Nursing and Midwifery, Kurdistan University of Medical Sciences, Sanandaj, Iran
4- Department of Biostatistics and Epidemiology, Faculty of Medicine, Zanjan University of Medical Sciences, Zanjan, Iran
5- Internal Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, School of medicine Shahrekord University of Medical Sciences, Shahrekord, Iran
6- Department of Midwifery, Clinical Care Research Center, Research Institute for Health Development, School of Nursing and Midwifery, Kurdistan University of Medical Sciences, Sanandaj, Iran (corresponding author) ,f.zaheri1968@gmail.com
2- Department of midwifery, Clinical Care Research Center, Research Institute for Health Development, School of Nursing and Midwifery, Kurdistan University of Medical Sciences, Sanandaj, Iran
3- Department of Midwifery, Clinical Care Research Center, Research Institute for Health Development, School of Nursing and Midwifery, Kurdistan University of Medical Sciences, Sanandaj, Iran
4- Department of Biostatistics and Epidemiology, Faculty of Medicine, Zanjan University of Medical Sciences, Zanjan, Iran
5- Internal Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, School of medicine Shahrekord University of Medical Sciences, Shahrekord, Iran
6- Department of Midwifery, Clinical Care Research Center, Research Institute for Health Development, School of Nursing and Midwifery, Kurdistan University of Medical Sciences, Sanandaj, Iran (corresponding author) ,
Abstract: (1112 Views)
Background & Aim: Birth Satisfaction is a woman's evaluation of her childbirth experience that be influenced by perceived stress. The aim of this study was to determine the rate of birth satisfaction and its relationship with perceived stress in pregnant women Admitted in Hospital Shahrekord, 2022
Material & Method: This descriptive-correlational study was conducted on 200 pregnant women with inclusion criteria and were hospitalized in Hajar Shahrekord's Hospital. Data collection tools were demographic and obstetric characteristics form, Cohen's Perceived Stress Scale and the Birth Satisfaction Scale-Revised Indicator (BSS-RI). At first, the participants were selected as convenience and entered the study after obtaining a written informed consent; then, the midwifery-demographic characteristics form and perceived stress in labor was completed through interviews and also by referring to the client's file. In the next step, the Birth Satisfaction Scale-Revised Indicator was completed by the client 12 to 24 hours after vaginal delivery and in the emergency cesarean section until discharge. The data was analyzed using SPSS version 16 software and statistical regression test. The significance level was considered P<0.05.
Results: According to the results, the mean score of birth satisfaction and perceived stress were (6.80±2.08) and (17.20±4.35) respectively; Also, the average score of two dimensions of Birth Satisfaction Scale, namely emotional pressure experienced during pregnancy and quality of care, were 4.1±8.84 and 2.1±72.33, respectively; In addition, no statistically significant relationship was observed between perceived stress (P=0.526) and demographic and obstetric characteristics (P<.05) with birth satisfaction.
Conclusion: Paying attention to the two dimensions of birth satisfaction tool and trying to increase their average score can have a positive effect on increasing overall satisfaction with childbirth. One of the ways to achieve this goal is to hold related workshops such as communication skills, stress management and clinical workshops related to the field for midwifery personnel and health care providers of pregnant mothers
Material & Method: This descriptive-correlational study was conducted on 200 pregnant women with inclusion criteria and were hospitalized in Hajar Shahrekord's Hospital. Data collection tools were demographic and obstetric characteristics form, Cohen's Perceived Stress Scale and the Birth Satisfaction Scale-Revised Indicator (BSS-RI). At first, the participants were selected as convenience and entered the study after obtaining a written informed consent; then, the midwifery-demographic characteristics form and perceived stress in labor was completed through interviews and also by referring to the client's file. In the next step, the Birth Satisfaction Scale-Revised Indicator was completed by the client 12 to 24 hours after vaginal delivery and in the emergency cesarean section until discharge. The data was analyzed using SPSS version 16 software and statistical regression test. The significance level was considered P<0.05.
Results: According to the results, the mean score of birth satisfaction and perceived stress were (6.80±2.08) and (17.20±4.35) respectively; Also, the average score of two dimensions of Birth Satisfaction Scale, namely emotional pressure experienced during pregnancy and quality of care, were 4.1±8.84 and 2.1±72.33, respectively; In addition, no statistically significant relationship was observed between perceived stress (P=0.526) and demographic and obstetric characteristics (P<.05) with birth satisfaction.
Conclusion: Paying attention to the two dimensions of birth satisfaction tool and trying to increase their average score can have a positive effect on increasing overall satisfaction with childbirth. One of the ways to achieve this goal is to hold related workshops such as communication skills, stress management and clinical workshops related to the field for midwifery personnel and health care providers of pregnant mothers
Type of Study: Research |
Subject:
Special
Received: 2023/02/12 | Revised: 2023/03/11 | Accepted: 2023/01/30 | Published: 2023/01/30 | ePublished: 2023/01/30
Received: 2023/02/12 | Revised: 2023/03/11 | Accepted: 2023/01/30 | Published: 2023/01/30 | ePublished: 2023/01/30
References
1. Gebuza G, Kaźmierczak M, Mieczkowska E, Gierszewska M, Banaszkiewicz M. Adequacy of social support and satisfaction with life during childbirth. Pol Ann Med. 2016;23(2):135-40. [DOI:10.1016/j.poamed.2016.01.004]
2. Oliveira DdC, Mandú ENT. Women with high-risk pregnancy: experiences and perceptions of needs and care. Escola Anna Nery. 2015;19(1):93-101. [DOI:10.5935/1414-8145.20150013]
3. Preis H, Lobel M, Benyamini Y. Between Expectancy and Experience: Testing a Model of Childbirth Satisfaction. Psychol Women Q. 2019;43(1):105-17. [DOI:10.1177/0361684318779537]
4. Bitew K, Ayichiluhm M, Yimam K. Maternal satisfaction on delivery service and its associated factors among mothers who gave birth in public health facilities of Debre Markos Town, Northwest Ethiopia. BioMed Res Int. 2015;2015(1):1-6. [DOI:10.1155/2015/460767]
5. 5 .Lumadi T, Buch E. Patients' satisfaction with midwifery services in a regional hospital and its referring clinics in the Limpopo Province of South Africa. Afr J Nurs Midwifery. 2011;13(2):14-28.
6. Asres G. Satisfaction and associated factors among mothers delivered at Asrade Zewude memorial primary hospital, Bure, west Gojjam, Amhara, Ethiopia: a cross sectional study. Prim Health Care. 2018;1(1):39-49. [DOI:10.5296/jpmr.v4i1.12716]
7. Ghanbari-Homayi S, Fardiazar Z, Meedya S, Mohammad-Alizadeh-Charandabi S, Asghari-Jafarabadi M, Mohammadi E, et al. Predictors of traumatic birth experience among a group of Iranian primipara women: a cross sectional study. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2019;19:182-91. [DOI:10.1186/s12884-019-2333-4]
8. 8 .Hinic K. Predictors of breastfeeding confidence in the early postpartum period. J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs. 2016;45(5):649-60. [DOI:10.1016/j.jogn.2016.04.010]
9. Bell AF, Andersson E. The birth experience and women's postnatal depression: a systematic review. Midwifery. 2016;39(1):112-23. [DOI:10.1016/j.midw.2016.04.014]
10. Al-kubaisi MK, Radeef AS, Ismail H. The Correlation of Maternal Childbirth Experience Satisfaction with Postnatal Depression, Anxiety and Stress Scoring. Int J Inn Res Med Sci. 2019;4(07):435-40. [DOI:10.23958/ijirms/vol04-i07/694]
11. Tani F, Castagna V. Maternal social support, quality of birth experience, and post-partum depression in primiparous women. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2017;30(6):689-92. [DOI:10.1080/14767058.2016.1182980]
12. Howarth AM, Swain N, Treharne GJ. Taking personal responsibility for well-being increases birth satisfaction of first time mothers. J Health Psychol. 2011;16(8):1221-30. [DOI:10.1177/1359105311403521]
13. 13 .Howarth A, Swain N, Treharne G. First-time New Zealand mothers' experience of birth: importance of relationship and support. J Appl Soc Psychol. 2011;45:6-11.
14. DorathyDevakirubai.T, Rebirth D, Mable S, Yadav B, Benjamin EE. Birth satisfaction of womendeliveredat CMC, Vellore. Nurs Health Sci. 2020;9(3):45-51.
15. Hamm RF, Srinivas SK, Levine LD. Risk factors and racial disparities related to low maternal birth satisfaction with labor induction: a prospective, cohort study. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2019;19(1):1-9. [DOI:10.1186/s12884-019-2658-z]
16. Hinic K. Understanding and Promoting Birth Satisfaction in New Mothers. MCN Am J Matern Child Nurs. 2017;42(4):210-5. [DOI:10.1097/NMC.0000000000000345]
17. Hashemi z. Relationship between perceived social support and stress before and after cesarean in pregnant women. J Fasa Univ Med. 2020;10(1):1951-9. [Persian].
18. Lisowska I, Lewicka M, Sulima M, Topyła W, Ruta D, Wdowiak A. Assessment of the severity of the stress levels of women in childbirth. PJPH. 2018;128(1):5-8. [DOI:10.2478/pjph-2018-0001]
19. Nast I, Bolten M, Meinlschmidt G, Hellhammer DH. How to measure prenatal stress? A systematic review of psychometric instruments to assess psychosocial stress during pregnancy. Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol. 2013;27(4):313-22. [DOI:10.1111/ppe.12051]
20. Abedi M, Rasoli J, Rabiepour S, Saboory E. The relationship between stress in pregnancy, and pregnancy outcomes: a longitudinal study. J Urmia Nurs Midwifery Fac. 2017;14(12):969-81. [Persian].
21. Littleton HL, Breitkopf CR, Berenson AB. Correlates of anxiety symptoms during pregnancy and association with perinatal outcomes: a meta-analysis. Am J obst Gynecol. 2007;196(5):424-32. [DOI:10.1016/j.ajog.2007.03.042]
22. Nilsson C, Olafsdottir OA, Lundgren I, Berg M, Dellenborg L. Midwives' care on a labour ward prior to the introduction of a midwifery model of care: a field of tension. Int J Qual Stud Health Well-being. 2019;14(1):1-14. [DOI:10.1080/17482631.2019.1593037]
23. Alderdice F, Lynn F. Stress in pregnancy: identifying and supporting women. B J M. 2009;17(9):552-9. [DOI:10.12968/bjom.2009.17.9.43787]
24. Browner W, Newman T, Hulley S. Designing clinical research: an epidemiologic approach. 4th ed. Philadelphia, PA. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins. 2017:65-94.
25. Cohen S, Kamarck T, Mermelstein R. A global measure of perceived stress. JHSB. 1983;2224(2):385-96. [DOI:10.2307/2136404]
26. Cohen S, Janicki‐Deverts D. Who's stressed? Distributions of psychological stress in the United States in probability samples from 1983, 2006, and 2009 1. J Appl Soc Psychol. 2012;42(6):1320-34. [DOI:10.1111/j.1559-1816.2012.00900.x]
27. Maroufizadeh S, Zareiyan A, Sigari N. Psychometric properties of the 14, 10 and 4-item "Perceived Stress Scale" among asthmatic patients in Iran. Payesh Health Mon. 2014;13(4):457-65. [In Persian].
28. Martin CR, Hollins Martin C, Redshaw M. The birth satisfaction scale-revised Indicator (BSS-RI). BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth. 2017;17(1):1-9. [DOI:10.1186/s12884-017-1459-5]
29. Romero-Gonzalez B, Peralta-Ramirez MI, Caparros-Gonzalez RA, Cambil-Ledesma A, Hollins Martin CJ, Martin CR. Spanish validation and factor structure of the Birth Satisfaction Scale-Revised (BSS-R). Midwifery. 2019;70:31-7. [DOI:10.1016/j.midw.2018.12.009]
30. Hinic K. Understanding and promoting birth satisfaction in new mothers. MCN: The American Journal of Maternal/Child Nursing. 2017;42(4):210-5. [DOI:10.1097/NMC.0000000000000345]
31. Omani-Samani R, Hollins Martin CJ, Martin CR, Maroufizadeh S, Ghaheri A, Navid B. The Birth Satisfaction Scale-Revised Indicator (BSS-RI): a validation study in Iranian mothers. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2019;7(1):1-5.
32. Jafari E, Mohebbi P, Mazloomzadeh S. Factors related to women's childbirth satisfaction in physiologic and routine childbirth groups. IJNMR. 2017;22(3):219-24. [Persian].
33. Ferrer MBC, Jordana MC, Meseguer CB, García CC, Roche MEM. Comparative study analysing women's childbirth satisfaction and obstetric outcomes across two different models of maternity care. BMJ Open. 2016;6(8):1-10. [DOI:10.1136/bmjopen-2016-011362]
34. Abedzadeh-Kalahroudi M, Karimian Z, Nasiri S, Khorshidifard MS. Anxiety and perceived stress of pregnant women towards Covid-19 disease and its related factors in Kashan (2020). Iran J Obstet Gynecol Infertil. 2021;24(5):8-18 [Persian]
35. Pluess M, Bolten M, Pirke K-M, Hellhammer D. Maternal trait anxiety, emotional distress, and salivary cortisol in pregnancy. Biol Psychol. 2010;83(3):169-75. [DOI:10.1016/j.biopsycho.2009.12.005]
36. Naghizadeh S. Comparison of pregnancy self-care, perceived social support and perceived stress in low-risk and high-risk groups. Journal of Health and Care. 2019;21(1):16-25. [Persian] [DOI:10.29252/jhc.21.1.16]
37. Lazarus RS, Folkman S. Cognitive theories of stress and the issue of circularity. In M.H. Appley, Trumbull, R.(Eds) Dynamics of stress: psychological, and social perspectives. New York: Springer; 1986. [DOI:10.1007/978-1-4684-5122-1_4]
38. Alipour Z, Lamyian M, Hajizadeh E. Anxiety during pregnancy: a risk factor for neonatal physical outcome? Nursing And Midwifery Journal. 2011;9(1):30-8. [Persian].
39. Epel ES, Crosswell AD, Mayer SE, Prather AA, Slavich GM, Puterman E, et al. More than a feeling: A unified view of stress measurement for population science. Frontiers in neuroendocrinology. 2018;49:146-69. [DOI:10.1016/j.yfrne.2018.03.001]
40. Ting RS-K, Yong Y-YA, Tan M-M, Yap C-K. Cultural responses to COVID-19 pandemic: Religions, illness perception, and perceived stress. Frontiers in psychology. 2021;12. [DOI:10.3389/fpsyg.2021.634863]
41. Pun VC, Manjourides J, Suh HH. Association of neighborhood greenness with self-perceived stress, depression and anxiety symptoms in older US adults. Environmental Health. 2018;17(1):1-11. [DOI:10.1186/s12940-018-0381-2]
Send email to the article author
| Rights and permissions | |
 |
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. |
