دوره 6، شماره 3 - ( زمستان 1399 )                   جلد 6 شماره 3 صفحات 1-24 | برگشت به فهرست نسخه ها

XML English Abstract Print


Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

Asadizaker M, rokhafroz D, sayadi N, Cheraghbeigi N. A comparative study between the Iranian Nursing PhD curriculum and the American Duke School of Nursing. SJNMP. 2021; 6 (3) :1-24
URL: http://sjnmp.muk.ac.ir/article-1-353-fa.html
اسدی ذاکر مرضیه، رخ افروز داریوش، صیادی ندا، چراغبیگی نساء. مقایسه تطبیقی برنامه درسی دوره دکترای پرستاری ایران و دانشکده پرستاری دوک آمریکا. فصلنامه پرستاری، مامایی و پیراپزشکی. 1399; 6 (3) :1-24

URL: http://sjnmp.muk.ac.ir/article-1-353-fa.html


1- دانشگاه علوم پزشکی جنی شاپور اهواز
2- دانشگاه علوم پزشکی جنی شاپور اهواز ، Nesa137193@gmail.com
چکیده:   (91 مشاهده)
زمینه و هدف: دوره­های آموزش پرستاری نقشی حیاتی در تربیت دانشجویان پرستاری ایفا می­کنند و لازم است که این دوره­ها از کیفیت بالایی برخوردار باشند تا بتوانند دانشجویان را به نحوی تربیت کنند که به عنوان افرادی شایسته مراقبت­ های ایمن و با کیفیت را ارئه دهند. هدف از مطالعه حاضر مقایسه تطبیقی برنامه درسی دوره دکترای پرستاری ایران و دانشکده پرستاری دوک آمریکا است.
مواد و روش ­ها: مطالعه حاضر از نوع مطالعات توصیفی- تطبیقی می­باشد. در این مطالعه برنامه دکترای پرستاری ایران با برنامه دکترای پرستاری دانشکده دوک آمریکا مقایسه شده است. داده­ های از طریق جستجو در سایت وزارت بهداشت ایران، سایت دانشکده پرستاری دوک و نیز پایگاه­ های داده فارسی و انگلیسی جمع­ آوری گردیده­اند. تطبیق بین دو برنامه با استفاده از روش Beredy که شامل چهار مرحله توصیف، تفسیر، همجواری و مقایسه است، صورت پذیرفته است.
یافته ­ها: دوره دکترای پرستاری در ایران نسبت به دانشکده دوک از قدمت بیشتری برخوردار است. بر خلاف متمرکز بودن شیوه پذیرش دانشجو در ایران، دانشکده دوک در این خصوص به شکلی مستقل عمل می­کند. دروس ارائه شده در برنامه دوک متنوع­ترند و تاکید زیادی بر حوزه آمار و روش تحقیق در این برنامه مشاهده می­شود. رسالت برنامه ایران در سطح ملی تعریف شده است اما دانشکده دوک در بیان رسالت خود از دیدگاهی فرامرزی برخوردار است.
نتیجه­ گیری: با توجه به چالش­هایی که در برنامه ایران وجود دارد ضروری است در برنامه آموزشی دکترای پرستاری ایران نیز به منظور همسو شدن با نیازهای جامعه، نظام بهداشت، رشته پرستاری و نیازهای اساتید و دانشجویان، بازنگری جدی صورت گیرد.
متن کامل [PDF 858 kb]   (37 دریافت)    
نوع مطالعه: پژوهشي | موضوع مقاله: تخصصي
دریافت: 1399/6/8 | ویرایش نهایی: 1399/12/11 | پذیرش: 1399/6/17 | انتشار: 1399/11/10 | انتشار الکترونیک: 1399/11/10

فهرست منابع
1. Nagata S, Gregg MF, Miki Y, Arimoto A, Murashima S, Kim MJ. Evaluation of doctoral nursing education in Japan by students, graduates, and faculty: A comparative study based on a cross-sectional questionnaire survey. Nurse Educ. Today. 2012;32(4):361-7 [DOI:10.1016/j.nedt.2011.05.019]
2. Molassiotis A, Wang T, Hoang HTX, Tan J-Y, Yamamoto-Mitani N, Cheng KF, et al. Doctoral nursing education in east and Southeast Asia: characteristics of the programs and students' experiences of and satisfaction with their studies. BMC Med. Educ. 2020;20(1):1-12. [DOI:10.1186/s12909-020-02060-1]
3. McKenna HP. Current trends of nursing doctoral education in Europe. Rwanda J. Health Sci. 2018;1(1): 39-42 [DOI:10.4314/rjmhs.v1i1.7]
4. Aliyari S, Maleki H, Pazargadi M, Abbaspour A. Developing and standardization of quality evaluation and accreditation indicators for curricula of baccalaureate degree nursing education in Iran. Ann. Mil. Health. Sci. Res. 2012;10(1):50-61. [Persian].
5. Lanara VA. The contribution of nursing research to the development of the discipline of nursing in Europe. Proceedings from the 7th Biennial Conference. Published by the Workgroup of European Nurse Researchers. Oslo 1994 (Jul 3-6) pp33-4.
6. González-Chordá VM, Maciá-Soler ML. Evaluation of the quality of the teaching-learning process in undergraduate courses in Nursing. REV LAT-AM ENFERM. 2015;23(4):700-7. [DOI:10.1590/0104-1169.0393.2606]
7. Naseri N, Salehi S. Accreditation of nursing education in Iran: Documenting the process. Iran J Nurs Midwifery Res. 2008;12(4):136-8
8. Abbott-Anderson K, Gilmore-Bykovskyi A, Lyles AA. The value of preparing PhD students as research mentors: Application of Kram's temporal mentoring model. J PROF NURS. 2016;32(6):421-9. [DOI:10.1016/j.profnurs.2016.02.004]
9. ADIB HM. Comparative Study of Nursing Ph. D. Education System and Curriculum in Iran and Alberta School of Nursing. Journal of Medical Education and Development. 2019;15(1):71-81. [Persian].
10. Zamanzadeh V, Jasemi M, Mansoori A, Khodabandeh F, Alsadat Hoseini F. Doctoral nursing students' perspectives towards educational quality of PhD course. Iran J Nurs. 2014;27(89):30-9. [Persian]. [DOI:10.29252/ijn.27.89.30]
11. McKenna H, Keeney S, Kim MJ, Park CG. Quality of doctoral nursing education in the United Kingdom: exploring the views of doctoral students and staff based on a cross‐sectional questionnaire survey. J. Adv. Nurs. 2014;70(7):1639-52. [DOI:10.1111/jan.12326]
12. Valizadeh L, Rezagolifam A, Soheili A, Zamanzadeh V, Mansouri Arani MR. A comparative study on the neonatal nursing curriculum in Iran and in McMaster university of Canada. The J Urmia Nurs Midwifery Fac. 2018;16(7):475-83. [Persian].
13. Esser F, Vliegenthart R. Comparative research methods. The international encyclopedia of communication research methods. Sustainability. 2017;12(17):1-18. [DOI:10.1002/9781118901731.iecrm0035]
14. Borzou SR, Oshvandi K, Cheraghi F, Moayed MS. Comparative study of nursing PhD education system and curriculum in Iran and John Hopkins school of nursing. Education Strategies in Medical Sciences. 2016;9(3):194-205. [Persian].
15. Dehghannezhad J, Heydarpoor Damanabad Z, Valizadeh L, Roshangar F, DadashZadeh A. A Comparative Study of Emergency Nursing MSc Curriculum in Iran and the USA. Iran J Med Educ. 2019;19:54-66. [Persian].
16. Ebrahimi S, Gangi Khezerlak A. Comparative study of information and communication technology development strategies in primary education of America, Australia and Iran. International Journal of Basic Sciences & Applied Research. 2015;4(1):1-5.
17. ADIB HM. Comparative Study of Nursing Ph. D. Education System and Curriculum in Iran and Alberta School of Nursing. Mil. Caring Sci J. 2019;6(1):69-77. [Persian]. [DOI:10.29252/mcs.6.1.69]
18. King WE. Duke University: A Brief Narrative History. Duke University Archives. Retrieved May 23, 2011 [Available from: https://library.duke.edu/rubenstein/uarchives/history/articles/narrative-history.
19. Duke University's School of Nursing. About Us/ Our History 2019 [Available from: https://nursing.duke.edu/about-us/our-history.
20. Tehran University of Medical Sciences, School of Nursing and Midwifery. General Specifications Ph.D. of Nursing 2019 [Available from: http://fnm.tums.ac.ir/userfiles/graduate/NURSING-PH.D.pdf.
21. Moonaghi HK, Valizadehzare N, Khorashadizadeh F. PhD programs in nursing in Iran and Canada: A qualitative study. J PAK MED ASSOC. 2017;67(6):863-8.
22. Rafati F, Khandan M, Sabzevari S, Nouhi E. Comparative study of nursing PhD curriculum in Iran and Widener university. Iran J Med Educ. 2015;15(70):555-68. [Persian].
23. Bereday GZ. Reflections on comparative methodology in education, 1964‐1966. Comp. Educ. 1967;3(3):169-287. [DOI:10.1080/0305006670030304]
24. Wojniak J, editor George ZF Bereday (Zygmunt Fijałkowski) and his comparative method in educational research. SHS Web of Conferences; 2018: EDP Sciences. [DOI:10.1051/shsconf/20184801050]
25. Ministry of Health and Medical Education. deputy for education [Available from: http://dme.behdasht.gov.ir/.
26. Duke University's School of Nursing. Academic Programs 2020 [Available from: https://nursing.duke.edu/.
27. Duke University's School of Nursing. About Us/ Our History (n d) [Available from: https://nursing.duke.edu/about-us/our-history.
28. Duke University's School of Nursing. About Us/ Philosophy 2011 [Available from: https://nursing.duke.edu/about-us/philosophy.
29. Duke University's School of Nursing. About Us/ Mission & Values 2016 [Available from: https://nursing.duke.edu/about-us/mission-values.
30. Duke University's School of Nursing. Academic Programs/ PhD Program in Nursing (n d) [Available from: https://nursing.duke.edu/academic-programs/phd-program-nursing.
31. Duke University's School of Nursing. Academic Programs/ Phd Program Nursing/ Phd Admissions (n d) [Available from: https://nursing.duke.edu/academic-programs/phd-program-nursing/phd-admissions.
32. Ministry of Health and Medical Education/ National Medical Education Assessment Center. Ph.D/ News and announcements of 2020 [Available from: https://www.sanjeshp.ir/Content.aspx?click=28.
33. Duke University's School of Nursing. Academic Programs/ Phd Program Nursing/ Phd Handbook and Bulletin (n d) [Available from: https://nursing.duke.edu/academic-programs/phd-program-nursing/phd-handbook-and-bulletin.
34. Duke University's School of Nursing. Academic Programs/ Phd Program Nursing/ Phd Curriculum (n d) [Available from: https://nursing.duke.edu/academic-programs/phd-program-nursing/phd-curriculum.
35. Kjellgren KI, Welin C, Danielson E. Evaluation of doctoral nursing programs-A review and a strategy for follow up. Nurse Educ. Today. 2005;25(4):316-25. [DOI:10.1016/j.nedt.2005.02.002]
36. Nasiri, al-Sadat F, Moez I, Shirin, Fallahi, Hussein A, et al. Internalization of Islamic values among students from the perspective of educational educators (Case study of girls' high schools in Hamadan). Journal of Cultural Engineering. 2011;6(57-58):74-85. [Persian].
37. Mayrl D. Secular conversions: Political institutions and religious education in the United States and Australia, 1800-2000: Cambridge University Press; 2016. [DOI:10.1017/CBO9781316217368]
38. Gonzalez Villarreal R, Arredondo A. 1861: The Emergence of Secular Education in Mexico. Hist. Caribe. 2017;12(30):25-49.
39. JAFARI AM, Chehrzed M, Shafipour S, Ghanbari A. Quality of Educational Services from View Points of Nursing and Midwifery Students Based on Servqual Model. Research in Medical Education. 2014;6(1):50-8. [DOI:10.18869/acadpub.rme.6.1.50]
40. Melnyk BM. Distinguishing the preparation and roles of doctor of philosophy and doctor of nursing practice graduates: National implications for academic curricula and health care systems. J. Nurs. Educ. 2013;52(8):442-8. [DOI:10.3928/01484834-20130719-01]
41. Seidi J, Alhani F, Anooshe M. Pathology of the principles and philosophy of education course in nursing doctoral degree: A qualitative study. J. Nurs. Educ. 2013;2(3):36-48. [Persian].
42. Mehraban MA, Taleghani F. Doctor of Nursing Practice (initiated or disorder). Iran J Med Educ. 2011;10(5):1-7.
43. Feizalahzadeh H, Hassani P. Challenges and opportunities of doctorate of nursing graduates in clinical settings. J. Promot. Manag. 2012;1(1):73-82. [Persian].
44. Farahani M, Ahmadi F. Doctoral nursing students' viewpoints about the nursing PhD curriculum. Iran J Med Educ. 2006;6(1):83-92. [Persian].
45. Adib-Hajbaghery M, Hosieni F. Comparison of Expected Potentials of PhD Nursing Students in Iran and Top Universities of the World. Iran J Nurs. 2018;31(113):30-41 .[Persian]. [DOI:10.29252/ijn.31.113.30]
46. gooshi dehaghi M, vafadar z. Comparative Study of Nursing PhD. Education Program in Iran and Colombia School of Nursing. Journal of Medical Education and Development. 2020;15(1):71-81. [Persian]. [DOI:10.18502/jmed.v15i1.3327]
47. Goliroshan S, Nobahar M, Babamohammadi H. Comparative study of Nursing Ph. D. Curriculum in Iran and Carolina. Iran J Nurs Res. 2019;14(5):47-57. [Persian].
48. Adib Hajbaghery M, Nabizadeh-Gharghozar Z. Comparative Study of Nursing PhD Education System and Curriculum in Iran and Alberta School of Nursing. Mil. Caring Sci J. 2019;6(1):69-78. [Persian]. [DOI:10.29252/mcs.6.1.69]
49. Khoshkesht S, Navab E. Comparative Study of Nursing PhD Education program in Tehran University of Medical Sciences and McGill University. Iran J Nurs Res. 2019;14(4):72-80. [Persian].
50. Sahebihagh M, Khaje Goudari M, Moghbeli G, Soheili A, Khadivi A, Valizadeh L. The challenges of nursing doctoral curriculum in Iran: a critical look based on Delphi technique. The J Urmia Nurs Midwifery Fac. 2017;15(6):424-39. [Persian].

ارسال نظر درباره این مقاله : نام کاربری یا پست الکترونیک شما:
CAPTCHA

ارسال پیام به نویسنده مسئول


کلیه حقوق این وب سایت متعلق به فصلنامه پرستاری، مامایی و پیراپزشکی می باشد.

طراحی و برنامه نویسی : یکتاوب افزار شرق

© 2021 All Rights Reserved | Scientific Journal of Nursing, Midwifery and Paramedical Faculty

Designed & Developed by :M.TAHAN