Volume 4, Issue 3 (Winter 2019)                   SJNMP 2019, 4(3): 6-15 | Back to browse issues page

XML Persian Abstract Print


Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

Ammarlou H, Mouzehkesh L, Movahedi Y. Effect of Computer Assisted Rehabilitation on Performance of Working Memory and Recognition in the Forms of Students. SJNMP. 2019; 4 (3) :6-15
URL: http://sjnmp.muk.ac.ir/article-1-179-en.html
1- Tabriz Islamic Art University , h.ammarloo@tabriziau.ac.ir
2- Tabriz Islamic Art University
Abstract:   (686 Views)
Background & Aim: Attaining optimal performance along with enhancing memory and recognition are among the most important goals of students in the field of academic achievement. This study aimed to evaluate the effect of computer assisted rehabilitation on the performance of working memory and recognition in the forms of Industrial Design students of Tabriz Islamic Art University.
Materials & Methods: This quasi-experimental research was conducted on two groups of 15 subjects, who were selected through simple random sampling. Data collection tools included the companion rehabilitation program and test of working memory and recognition in forms. Data analysis was performed in SPSS version 21 using One-way ANCOVA. 
Results: In this study, there was a significant difference between the test and control groups in terms of mean pretest and post-test scores (P<0.01). Accordingly, computer assisted rehabilitation improved the working memory and recognition in the forms of the subjects in the test group.
Conclusion: According to the results of the study, computer assisted rehabilitation can be used as a method to achieve optimal performance in students.
Full-Text [PDF 627 kb]   (225 Downloads)    
Type of Study: Research | Subject: Special
Received: 2018/10/17 | Revised: 2019/06/30 | Accepted: 2018/12/5 | Published: 2019/10/24 | ePublished: 2019/10/24

References
1. Repovs G, Baddeley AD. The multi - Component model of working memory: exploration in experimental cognitive psychology. Journal of experimental cognitive psychology. 2006; 139 (12): 5-21. [DOI:10.1016/j.neuroscience.2005.12.061]
2. Loosli S, Buschkuehl M, Perrig W, Jaeggi S. Working memory training improves reading processes in typically developing children. Child Neuropsychol. 2012; 18 (3): 62-78. [DOI:10.1080/09297049.2011.575772]
3. Enger PM, Santos FH, Gathercole SE. Are working memory measures free of socio-economic influence?. J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2008; 51(6): 1580-1587. [DOI:10.1044/1092-4388(2008/07-0210)]
4. Wilson B. Memory Rehabilitation Integrating Theory and practice. New York: The Guilford Press; 2009.
5. Ghanaii A. Effect of sports rhythmic movment training on memoirs' neuropsychological function in students with learning disabilities [dissertation]. Tabriz: Tabriz University; 2008. [Persian].
6. Gatian A, Garolera M. Efficacy of an adjunctive computer based cognitive impairment and Alzheimers disease: a single blind randomized clinical trial. Int J Geriatr Psychiatr.2012; 15 (2): 28-35. [DOI:10.1002/gps.3794]
7. Thorell LB, Linqvist S, Nutley SB, Bohlin G, Klingberg T. Training and transfer effects of executive functions in preschool children. Int J Dev Sci. 2009; 12(1): 106-113. [DOI:10.1111/j.1467-7687.2008.00745.x]
8. Owen AM, Hampshire A, Grahn JA. Putting brain training to the test nature. Europe PMC Funders Group. 2010; 10, 465 (7299): 775-8. [DOI:10.1038/nature09042]
9. Aziziyan M, Asadzadeh H, Alizadeh H, Dortaj F, Sadipour E. The Effectiveness of Executive Functions Training on Enhancement of Attention, Working Memory, and Inhibition in Pupils with borderline Intellectual Functioning. Journal of Research in Behavioral Sciences. 2017; 15(1): 93-103.
10. Zolfi V, Rezaee A. The Effect of Working Memory Computer Assisted Intervention on Mathematics Anxiety, Working Memory and Performanceing Mathematics among Students with Mathematics Learning Disabilities. Journal of Instruction and Evaluation. 2015; 8(30):75-86. [Persian].
11. Ponce HR, Lopez MJ, Mayer RE. Instructional effectiveness of a computer-supported program for teaching reading comprehension strategies. Comput Educ. 2012; 5 (13):1170-83. [DOI:10.1016/j.compedu.2012.05.013]
12. Pickering, S, Chubb R. Working memory in dyslexia: a comparison of performance of dyslexics and reading age controls on the WMTB-C. Manuscript in preparation. 2005.
13. Pickering S. Working memory in dyslexic children. In S. Gather Cole, & T, Alleyway (Eds). Working memory and neurodevelopmental disorders. Psychology press. 2006.
14. Kesler SR, Lacayo NJ, Jo B. A pilot study of an online cognitive rehabilitation program for executive function skills in children with cancer-related brain injury, Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Stanford University. 2011; 25:101-12. [DOI:10.3109/02699052.2010.536194]
15. Casey J. A model to guide the conceptualization, assessment, and diagnosis of nonverbal learning disorders. Can J Sch Psychol. 2001; 27: 35-57. [DOI:10.1177/0829573512436966]
16. Buchan BD. The classification of reading disability subtypes and the efficacy of hemisphere specific stimulation. 2009.
17. Robertson SI. Problem solving, Taylor & Francis. 2016. [DOI:10.4324/9781315712796]

Add your comments about this article : Your username or Email:
CAPTCHA

Send email to the article author


© 2020 All Rights Reserved | Scientific Journal of Nursing, Midwifery and Paramedical Faculty

Designed & Developed by : Yektaweb