Volume 1, Issue 1 (Summer 2015)                   SJNMP 2015, 1(1): 33-40 | Back to browse issues page


XML Persian Abstract Print


Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

Rokhzadi M Z, Zehni K. Comparing nursing instructors and fourth-year nursing students’ perspectives on clinical education problems. SJNMP. 2015; 1 (1) :33-40
URL: http://sjnmp.muk.ac.ir/article-1-27-en.html
1- Kurdistan University of Medical Sciences , zrokhzadi@yahoo.com
2- Kurdistan University of Medical Sciences
Abstract:   (665 Views)

Background and Aim: Clinical education is the heart of nursing education. It is a complex process which is affected by different factors. Identifying the problems of clinical education is the first step to resolving them. The aim of this study was to compare nursing instructors and fourth-year nursing students’ perspectives on problems with clinical education.

Methods: This descriptive-analytical study was conducted in 2007–2008. The census method was employed for recruiting twenty one nursing instructors and 130 fourth-year nursing students from the Nursing and Midwifery Faculty of Kurdistan University of Medical Sciences, Sanandaj, Iran. A 39-item questionnaire was used for assessing the problems of clinical nursing education. Study data were analyzed by using the SPSS software.

Findings: Most of the participating students (58.2%) noted that pre-clinical education suffers from many problems while most of the nursing instructors (66.7%) highlighted that the problems of pre-clinical nursing education are moderate. On the other hand, most of the students (53.4%) and instructors (73.7%) evaluated the problems of clinical education environment as moderate. Finally, most of the students (49.1%) and instructors (52.6%) highlighted that the problems of clinical evaluation are moderate.

Conclusion: Pre-clinical education, clinical education environment, and clinical evaluation are problematic. Providing and improving educational facilities as well as revising clinical evaluation procedures are recommended.

Full-Text [PDF 361 kb]   (236 Downloads)    
Type of Study: Research | Subject: Special
Received: 2015/11/25 | Revised: 2015/11/25 | Accepted: 2015/11/25 | Published: 2015/11/25 | ePublished: 2015/11/25

Add your comments about this article : Your username or Email:
CAPTCHA

Send email to the article author


© 2019 All Rights Reserved | Scientific Journal of Nursing, Midwifery and Paramedical Faculty

Designed & Developed by : Yektaweb