Volume 11, Issue 1 (9-2025)
SJNMP 2025, 11(1): 0-0 |
Back to browse issues page
Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
Emami P, Fotouhi P, Yaghoubi M, Amani N. Investigating the Quality of Clinical Education and Related Demographic Factors from the Viewpoint of students at the Paramedical Faculty in Medical Science of Kurdistan in 2024. SJNMP 2025; 11 (1)
URL: http://sjnmp.muk.ac.ir/article-1-679-en.html
URL: http://sjnmp.muk.ac.ir/article-1-679-en.html
1- Department of Emergency Medicine, Faculty of Paramedical Sciences, Kurdistan University of Medical Sciences, Sanandaj, Iran.
2- Department of Anesthesia, Faculty of Paramedical Sciences, Kurdistan University of Medical Sciences, Sanandaj, Iran
3- Department of Nursing, Faculty of Nursing and Midwifery, Kurdistan University of Medical Sciences, Sanandaj, Iran
4- Department of Anesthesia, Faculty of Paramedical Sciences, Kurdistan University of Medical Sciences, Sanandaj, Iran ,ne.amani1995@gmail.com
2- Department of Anesthesia, Faculty of Paramedical Sciences, Kurdistan University of Medical Sciences, Sanandaj, Iran
3- Department of Nursing, Faculty of Nursing and Midwifery, Kurdistan University of Medical Sciences, Sanandaj, Iran
4- Department of Anesthesia, Faculty of Paramedical Sciences, Kurdistan University of Medical Sciences, Sanandaj, Iran ,
Abstract: (21 Views)
Introduction: Clinical education is one of the most important subjects of medical education, especially among paramedical fields, considering its clinical and application. This research was conducted with the aim of investigating the clinical education quality and demographic factors related to it in paramedical faculty students' viewpoints.
Materials and Methods: This study is descriptive-analytical and cross-sectional. The population consisted of 209 paramedical faculty students, met the inclusion criteria. Sampling was performed using the census method and finally 172 students completed the questionnaire and not-completed questionnaire was excluded of the study. Data collecting tools included a demographic questionnaire and a questionnaire assessing factors affecting the quality of clinical education. Data were analyzed by SPSS software version 26 and descriptive statistics.
Results: Most of the participants were female, 4th semester, field of anesthesiology, residence in dormitory, mean age 22.950 ± 2.464 and grade point average (GPA) was 16.23 ± 1.071. The quality of clinical education was favorable and the highest scores belong to the instructor and the lowest to the educational environment. There was no relationship between gender and grade point average with the quality of clinical education and its domains (p>0.05). But there was a relationship between the educational field, academic semester, place of residence and age with some domains (p>0.05).
Conclusion: Despite the favorable clinical quality levels, there are deficiencies in the educational environment and evaluation methods. It is necessary for policy makers and educational managers of medical sciences universities to standardize facilities and clinical environments and use new evaluation methods.
Materials and Methods: This study is descriptive-analytical and cross-sectional. The population consisted of 209 paramedical faculty students, met the inclusion criteria. Sampling was performed using the census method and finally 172 students completed the questionnaire and not-completed questionnaire was excluded of the study. Data collecting tools included a demographic questionnaire and a questionnaire assessing factors affecting the quality of clinical education. Data were analyzed by SPSS software version 26 and descriptive statistics.
Results: Most of the participants were female, 4th semester, field of anesthesiology, residence in dormitory, mean age 22.950 ± 2.464 and grade point average (GPA) was 16.23 ± 1.071. The quality of clinical education was favorable and the highest scores belong to the instructor and the lowest to the educational environment. There was no relationship between gender and grade point average with the quality of clinical education and its domains (p>0.05). But there was a relationship between the educational field, academic semester, place of residence and age with some domains (p>0.05).
Conclusion: Despite the favorable clinical quality levels, there are deficiencies in the educational environment and evaluation methods. It is necessary for policy makers and educational managers of medical sciences universities to standardize facilities and clinical environments and use new evaluation methods.
Keywords: Clinical education, paramedical, anesthesiology, laboratory medical science, radiology, medical emergency
Type of Study: Research |
Subject:
Special
Received: 2025/10/11 | Revised: 2026/01/27 | Accepted: 2025/09/23 | Published: 2025/09/23 | ePublished: 2025/09/23
Received: 2025/10/11 | Revised: 2026/01/27 | Accepted: 2025/09/23 | Published: 2025/09/23 | ePublished: 2025/09/23
Send email to the article author
| Rights and permissions | |
 |
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. |
