Volume 7, Issue 3 (winter 2022)
SJNMP 2022, 7(3): 24-36 |
Back to browse issues page
Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
keshavarzi S. Survey of Nurses' Views on Family Presence During Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation (CPR). SJNMP 2022; 7 (3) :24-36
URL: http://sjnmp.muk.ac.ir/article-1-430-en.html
URL: http://sjnmp.muk.ac.ir/article-1-430-en.html
Faculty of Nursing and Midwifery, kurdistan University of Medical Science , salehkeshavarzy@gmail.com
Abstract: (1142 Views)
Background & Aim: Cardiopulmonary resuscitation is one of the most important hospitals procedures to save patients' lives, and it is very important removing conditions that disrupt its process. Presence of family patient during resuscitation (FPDR) can be a negative or positive factor in the performance of the resuscitation team. In various studies, contradictory results have been obtained from the presence of the family during resuscitation.
Materials & Methods: In this descriptive-analytical study, 294 nurses from 3 teaching hospitals in Sanandaj were entered in the study. The samples were selected as available and the demographic information questionnaire and a special questionnaire to examine the nurses' views on the presence of the family during resuscitation with two parts of the harms (12 questions) and the benefits of their presence (8 questions) were given to them by the researcher. After completing them, the data were analyzed by SPSSv.20 software.
Results: Most Nurses Disagree with Family presence about ”family interfering in resuscitation” and " difficulty in deciding team leader to off resuscitation that patient is death" and also about benefits, The most factor that agreed upon by nurses is " family Ensuring that everything can be done for their patient by the resuscitation team, is done"
Conclusion: According to the nurses' views, since the presence of the family during resuscitation has more harmful rather than its benefits, therefore, a decision must be made in medical centers, especially hospitals, to prevent the presence of the patient's family in the resuscitation room
Materials & Methods: In this descriptive-analytical study, 294 nurses from 3 teaching hospitals in Sanandaj were entered in the study. The samples were selected as available and the demographic information questionnaire and a special questionnaire to examine the nurses' views on the presence of the family during resuscitation with two parts of the harms (12 questions) and the benefits of their presence (8 questions) were given to them by the researcher. After completing them, the data were analyzed by SPSSv.20 software.
Results: Most Nurses Disagree with Family presence about ”family interfering in resuscitation” and " difficulty in deciding team leader to off resuscitation that patient is death" and also about benefits, The most factor that agreed upon by nurses is " family Ensuring that everything can be done for their patient by the resuscitation team, is done"
Conclusion: According to the nurses' views, since the presence of the family during resuscitation has more harmful rather than its benefits, therefore, a decision must be made in medical centers, especially hospitals, to prevent the presence of the patient's family in the resuscitation room
Type of Study: Qualitative study |
Subject:
Special
Received: 2021/08/2 | Revised: 2022/05/19 | Accepted: 2021/08/14 | Published: 2022/03/9 | ePublished: 2022/03/9
Received: 2021/08/2 | Revised: 2022/05/19 | Accepted: 2021/08/14 | Published: 2022/03/9 | ePublished: 2022/03/9
References
1. Okonta KE, Okoh BA. Theoretical knowledge of cardiopulmonary resuscitation among clinical medical students in the University of Port Harcourt, Nigeria. African Journal of Medical and Health Sciences. 2015; 14(1):42-51. [DOI:10.4103/2384-5589.153391]
2. Henderson O, Ballesteros D. Evaluation of a hospital-wide resuscitation team: does it increase survival for in hospital cardiopulmonary arrest. Resuscitation. 2001; 48(2): 111-16. [DOI:10.1016/S0300-9572(00)00263-X]
3. Zali M, hasankhani H, dadashzadeh A, ghafouri R. Family presence during resuscitation: A descriptive study with Iranian nurses and patients' family members. 2017; 34(8):11-16 [Persian] [DOI:10.1016/j.ienj.2017.05.001]
4. Goldberger ZD, Nallamothu BK, Nichol G, Chan PS, Curtis JR, Cooke CR. Policies allowing family presence during resuscitation and patterns of care during in-hospital cardiac arrest. Circulation: Cardiovascular Quality and Outcomes. 2015; 8(3):226-34. [DOI:10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.114.001272]
5. Barreto MD, Peruzzo HE, Garcia-Vivar C, Marcon SS. Family presence during cardiopulmonary resuscitation and invasive procedures: a meta-synthesis. Revista da Escola de Enfermagem da USP. 2019; 25(53):1-13 [DOI:10.1590/s1980-220x2018001303435]
6. Kianmehr N, Mofidi M, Rahmani H, Shahin Y. The attitudes of team members towards family presence during hospital-based CPR: A study based in the Muslim setting of four Iranian teaching hospitals. Journal of the Royal College of Physicians of Edinburgh. 2010; 40(1): 4-8. [Persian] [DOI:10.4997/JRCPE.2010.102]
7. Fulbrook P, Latour J, Albarran J, de Graaf W, Lynch F, Devictor D, Norekvål T. The presence of family members during cardiopulmonary resuscitation. Connect: The World of Critical Care Nursing. 2007; 5(4):86-8. [DOI:10.1891/1748-6254.5.4.86]
8. Joyner Jr BL. Does family presence in the trauma bay help or hinder care? AMA journal of ethics. 2018; 20(5):507-12. [DOI:10.1001/journalofethics.2018.20.5.sect1-1805]
9. Jabre P, Belpomme V, Azoulay E, Jacob L, Bertrand L, Lapostolle F, et al. Family presence during cardiopulmonary resuscitation. New England Journal of Medicine. 2013; 368(11):1008-18. [DOI:10.1056/NEJMoa1203366]
10. Samples Twibell R, Bousman D. Hollars R, Johnson D. Nurses perceptions of their self cofidense and riske and benefits of family presence durin resuscitation. 2008; 17(2): 101-11. [DOI:10.4037/ajcc2008.17.2.101]
11. Parial LL, Torres GC, Macindo JR. Family presence during resuscitation benefits-risks scale (FPDR-BRS): Instrument development and psychometric validation. Journal of emergency nursing. 2016; 42(3):213-23. [DOI:10.1016/j.jen.2015.08.018]
12. Gunes UY, Zaybak A. A study of Turkish critical care nurses' perspectives regarding family‐witnessed resuscitation. Journal of clinical nursing. 2009; 18(20):2907-15. [DOI:10.1111/j.1365-2702.2009.02826.x]
13. Nga Yee L, Susan K. Attitudes of healthcare staff and patients' family members towards family presence during resuscitation in adult critical care units, Journal of Clinical Nursing. 2012; 21(13-14): 2083-93. [DOI:10.1111/j.1365-2702.2011.04013.x]
14. Patricia J, Vanessa B, Elie A, Line Jacob, Lionel B, Frederic L, and et all,. Family Presence during Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation. 2013; 22(16):108-18.
15. Sheng CK, Lim CK, Rashidi A. A multi-center study on the attitudes of Malaysian emergency health care staff towards allowing family presence during resuscitation of adult patients. International journal of emergency medicine. 2010; 3(4):287-91. [DOI:10.1007/s12245-010-0218-4]
16. Brandon D, Ouida P, Kristen A. Attitudes of Community Hospital Critical Care Nurses Toward Family-Witnessed Resuscitation, Am J Crit Care. 2019; 28(2): 142-48. [DOI:10.4037/ajcc2019162]
17. Vavarouta A, Xanthos T, Papadimitriou L, Kouskouni E, Iacovidou N. Family presence during resuscitation and invasive procedures: physicians' and nurses' attitudes working in pediatric departments in Greece. Resuscitation. 2011; 82(6):713-6. [DOI:10.1016/j.resuscitation.2011.02.011]
Send email to the article author
| Rights and permissions | |
 |
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. |
