Volume 8, Issue 4 (5-2023)
SJNMP 2023, 8(4): 13-24 |
Back to browse issues page
Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
bakhshandeh A, Parhizkar A. Investigating the causes of domestic violence against men by their wives in community health centers in Sanandaj city in 2021-2022. SJNMP 2023; 8 (4) :13-24
URL: http://sjnmp.muk.ac.ir/article-1-538-en.html
URL: http://sjnmp.muk.ac.ir/article-1-538-en.html
1- Student Research Committee, Tehran University of Research Sciences, Tehran, Iran
2- Department of Community Health Nursing, Faculty of Nursing and Midwifery, Clinical Care Research Center, Research Institute for Health Development, Kurdistan University of Medical Sciences, Sanandaj, Iran , PARHIZKAR_AHDIEH@YAHOO.COM
2- Department of Community Health Nursing, Faculty of Nursing and Midwifery, Clinical Care Research Center, Research Institute for Health Development, Kurdistan University of Medical Sciences, Sanandaj, Iran , PARHIZKAR_AHDIEH@YAHOO.COM
Abstract: (766 Views)
Background & Aim: Nowadays, domestic violence is one of the most common public health problems around the world, which includes the components of child abuse, elder abuse, and spousal abuse. This study aims to Investigation of violence against men by their wives in community health centers in Sanandaj city, 2022.
Materials & Methods: This study is cross-sectional (descriptive-analytical). The sample size was 341 men living in Sanandaj city. The data collection method was a questionnaire that was completed by self-report method. KMO and Bartlett's sphericity tests were used for data qualification and adequacy. The data were analyzed using descriptive (mean and standard deviation) and analytical (T-tes and χ2) statistical tests in SPSS software version 23.
Results: The results showed that. The mean and total score of spousal abuse was 35.12 with a standard deviation of 8.03. The most common reason for misbehavior is the request for custody of the children (69.5%) and the involvement of the man's family (54.3%), and the least reason for misbehavior is the husband's financial dependence on the woman's family (16.4%) and the husband's emotional dependence on it his own family (16.4%).
Conclusion: The results of this study show the fact that violence against men is done for different reasons. Therefore, it is necessary to expand the culture of conversation and negotiation within the family by increasing the knowledge of individuals, and by reducing the conflict in the family and its management, as well as by carrying out educational measures, it is possible to correct and eliminate the violent behavior of the couple as much as possible
Materials & Methods: This study is cross-sectional (descriptive-analytical). The sample size was 341 men living in Sanandaj city. The data collection method was a questionnaire that was completed by self-report method. KMO and Bartlett's sphericity tests were used for data qualification and adequacy. The data were analyzed using descriptive (mean and standard deviation) and analytical (T-tes and χ2) statistical tests in SPSS software version 23.
Results: The results showed that. The mean and total score of spousal abuse was 35.12 with a standard deviation of 8.03. The most common reason for misbehavior is the request for custody of the children (69.5%) and the involvement of the man's family (54.3%), and the least reason for misbehavior is the husband's financial dependence on the woman's family (16.4%) and the husband's emotional dependence on it his own family (16.4%).
Conclusion: The results of this study show the fact that violence against men is done for different reasons. Therefore, it is necessary to expand the culture of conversation and negotiation within the family by increasing the knowledge of individuals, and by reducing the conflict in the family and its management, as well as by carrying out educational measures, it is possible to correct and eliminate the violent behavior of the couple as much as possible
Type of Study: Research |
Subject:
Special
Received: 2023/04/3 | Revised: 2023/06/19 | Accepted: 2023/05/31 | Published: 2023/05/31 | ePublished: 2023/05/31
Received: 2023/04/3 | Revised: 2023/06/19 | Accepted: 2023/05/31 | Published: 2023/05/31 | ePublished: 2023/05/31
References
1. Dalal K, Lindqvist K. A national study of the prevalence and correlates of domestic violence among women in India. Asia Pacific Journal of Public Health. 2012;24(2):265-77. [DOI:10.1177/1010539510384499]
2. Deshpande S. Sociocultural and legal aspects of violence against men. Journal of Psychosexual Health. 2019;1(3-4):246-49. [DOI:10.1177/2631831819894176]
3. Abbaszadeh M, Ahyayi P, Koohi K. Husband abuse: case study of married men in Tabriz metropolis. 2016;6(24):19-40.
4. Thureau S, Le Blanc-Louvry I, Gricourt C, Proust B. Conjugal violence: a comparison of violence against men by women and women by men. Journal of forensic and legal medicine. 2015;31:42-46. [DOI:10.1016/j.jflm.2014.12.014]
5. Sheikh F, Koolaee AK, Zadeh MR. The comparison of self-differentiation and self-concept in divorced and non-divorced women who experience domestic violence. International journal of high risk behaviors & addiction. 2013;2(2):66-71. [DOI:10.5812/ijhrba.10029]
6. Kolbe V, Büttner A. Domestic violence against men-prevalence and risk factors. Deutsches Ärzteblatt International. 2020 Aug;117(31-32):534-41. [DOI:10.3238/arztebl.2020.0534]
7. Gholamzadeh S, Zarenezhad M, Rezaeian M, Iravanian A, Ghorbanzadeh M, Sahraian A. Epidemiology of husband abuse in Fars province among people referred to forensic medicine administrations of Shiraz from 2012 to 2014: a short report. Journal of Rafsanjan University of Medical Sciences. 2018;17(8):781-88.
8. Ghazizadeh H, Zahrakar K, Kiamanesh A, Mohsenzadeh F. Conceptual model of underlying factors in women domestic violence against men. Iranian Journal of Psychiatric Nursing. 2018;6(4):35-48. [Persian]
9. Savall F, Lechevalier A, Hérin F, Vergnault M, Telmon N, Bartoli C. A ten-year experience of physical Intimate partner violence (IPV) in a French forensic unit. Journal of forensic and legal medicine. 2017;46(1):12-15. [DOI:10.1016/j.jflm.2016.12.007]
10. Panaghi L, Dehghani M, Abbasi M, Mohammadi S, Maleki G. Investigating reliability, validity and factor structure of the revised conflict tactics scale. Journal of Family Research. 2011;7(1):103-7.
11. Fardin A, Rafie H, Aliyar A, Bahrami M. Development and validation of a short form questionnaire to measuring wife abuse. Social welfare quarterly. 2019;19(72):131-54. [Persian] [DOI:10.29252/refahj.19.72.131]
12. Firoozjaeian AA, Razzaqi N. Sociological Analysis Of The Effect Of Family Disorder On Women's Domestic Violence Against Men. Iran journal snlaiir. 2016;6(2):105-23. [DOI:10.18869/acadpub.jspi.6.2.105]
13. Latifian M, Arshi M, Alipour F, Ghaedamini Harouni G. Study on relationship of domestic violence with emotional divorce among married females in Tehran. Quarterly journal of social work. 2016;5(2):5-12. [Persian]
14. Chaudhuri S, Morash M, Yingling J. Marriage migration, patriarchal bargains, and wife abuse: A study of South Asian women. Violence against women. 2014;20(2):141-61. [DOI:10.1177/1077801214521326]
Send email to the article author
| Rights and permissions | |
 |
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. |
