Volume 3, Issue 3 (winter 2018)
SJNMP 2018, 3(3): 24-35 |
Back to browse issues page
Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
Adib-Hajbagheri M, Bolandianbafghi S. Study of the quality of Hermeneutic phenomenology studies in nursing. SJNMP 2018; 3 (3) :24-35
URL: http://sjnmp.muk.ac.ir/article-1-126-en.html
URL: http://sjnmp.muk.ac.ir/article-1-126-en.html
1- Trauma Nursing Research Center, Kashan University of Medical Sciences , adibhajbagheri_m@kaums.ac.ir
2- Faculty of Nursing Midwifery
2- Faculty of Nursing Midwifery
Abstract: (3911 Views)
Background & Aim: The number of nursing researchers who use phenomenology studies and especially hermeneutics in their research is increasing. The validity of these studies has always been sought by researchers to judge the accuracy of the research, the methods of study and its findings. Therefore, in this study, the quality of Hermeneutic phenomenology studies in nursing was investigated.
Materials & Methods: This study is a descriptive study conducted through extensive search of Proquest, PubMed, Web of Science and Scopus databases. In this study 220 eligible articles were reviewed. The quality of papers was reviewed based on the researcher-made checklist derived from the Guba and Linck criteria.
Results: The findings show that the minimum score earned by articles was 52.33 out of 69.9 and the maximum was 135.18 out of 140. 15% of the articles were of high quality, 52% had a moderate quality and 33% had poor quality. Moreover, the findings also showed credibility at 42%, transferability at 85%, dependability at 54%, and confirmability at 59% of cases were observed.
Conclusion: Most of the reviewed phenomenology articles had a moderate quality. Most of the articles were moderate in terms of transferability, dependability and confirmability and were inadequate in terms of credibility.
Materials & Methods: This study is a descriptive study conducted through extensive search of Proquest, PubMed, Web of Science and Scopus databases. In this study 220 eligible articles were reviewed. The quality of papers was reviewed based on the researcher-made checklist derived from the Guba and Linck criteria.
Results: The findings show that the minimum score earned by articles was 52.33 out of 69.9 and the maximum was 135.18 out of 140. 15% of the articles were of high quality, 52% had a moderate quality and 33% had poor quality. Moreover, the findings also showed credibility at 42%, transferability at 85%, dependability at 54%, and confirmability at 59% of cases were observed.
Conclusion: Most of the reviewed phenomenology articles had a moderate quality. Most of the articles were moderate in terms of transferability, dependability and confirmability and were inadequate in terms of credibility.
Type of Study: Research |
Subject:
Special
Received: 2018/07/8 | Revised: 2018/08/27 | Accepted: 2018/07/18 | Published: 2018/08/15 | ePublished: 2018/08/15
Received: 2018/07/8 | Revised: 2018/08/27 | Accepted: 2018/07/18 | Published: 2018/08/15 | ePublished: 2018/08/15
Send email to the article author
| Rights and permissions | |
 |
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. |
