Volume 7, Issue 1 (Summer 2021)
SJNMP 2021, 7(1): 12-24 |
Back to browse issues page
Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
Amraei K, Papi F, Tahoonei M. Predicting the quality of life in women with Multiple Sclerosis based on coping styles, social support and sexual perversion mediated by resilience. SJNMP 2021; 7 (1) :12-24
URL: http://sjnmp.muk.ac.ir/article-1-437-en.html
URL: http://sjnmp.muk.ac.ir/article-1-437-en.html
1- Department of psychology, Lorestan University, Khoramabbad, Iran.
2- Department of psychology, Lorestan University, Khoramabbad, Iran
2- Department of psychology, Lorestan University, Khoramabbad, Iran
Abstract: (1854 Views)
Background & Aim: The quality of life of patients with multiple sclerosis is affected by their disease conditions. So, the aim of this study was to predict the quality of life of women with inflammatory bowel disease based on coping styles, social support and sexual perversion mediated by resilience.
Materials & Methods: The present study is a correlation in which is analyzed in the form of a structural equation model. The statistical population of the present study was female patients who were members of MS associations in 2020. 147 people were selected as the sample using the available sampling method. The instruments were the Quality of Life Questionnaire, Resilience Questionnaire, Social Support, Coping Styles and Sexual Function. The data were analyzed using AMOS software.
Results: The results showed that the overall model has an acceptable fit. The Components of social support (p< 0.01), problem- solving coping strategies (p< 0.01) and resilience (p< 0.01) with positive quality of life, and emotional problem solving strategies (p< 0.01) and sexual perversion (p< 0.01) have a negative relationship with quality of life. Coping styles (p< 0.01) and social support (p< 0.01) predicted 0.48 of the variance of resilience. The role of resilience mediation is also significant for the components of coping styles, social support, However, due to the lack of correlation between sexual dysfunction (p <0.05) with resilience has no mediating role for this variable, in total, endogenous and exogenous variables predicted and explained 0.59 of quality of life variability.
Materials & Methods: The present study is a correlation in which is analyzed in the form of a structural equation model. The statistical population of the present study was female patients who were members of MS associations in 2020. 147 people were selected as the sample using the available sampling method. The instruments were the Quality of Life Questionnaire, Resilience Questionnaire, Social Support, Coping Styles and Sexual Function. The data were analyzed using AMOS software.
Results: The results showed that the overall model has an acceptable fit. The Components of social support (p< 0.01), problem- solving coping strategies (p< 0.01) and resilience (p< 0.01) with positive quality of life, and emotional problem solving strategies (p< 0.01) and sexual perversion (p< 0.01) have a negative relationship with quality of life. Coping styles (p< 0.01) and social support (p< 0.01) predicted 0.48 of the variance of resilience. The role of resilience mediation is also significant for the components of coping styles, social support, However, due to the lack of correlation between sexual dysfunction (p <0.05) with resilience has no mediating role for this variable, in total, endogenous and exogenous variables predicted and explained 0.59 of quality of life variability.
Keywords: Resilience, Sexual perversion, Social support, coping styles, Quality of life, Multiple Sclerosis, Women
Type of Study: Research |
Subject:
Special
Received: 2021/04/4 | Revised: 2021/09/5 | Accepted: 2021/04/29 | Published: 2021/09/4 | ePublished: 2021/09/4
Received: 2021/04/4 | Revised: 2021/09/5 | Accepted: 2021/04/29 | Published: 2021/09/4 | ePublished: 2021/09/4
References
1. Azizi M, Zarei B, Rahimi H, Mousavi Mirzaei SM, Javan N, Vagharseyyedin SA. Comparison of the Effects of Peer-led and Nurse-led Self-management Programs on Self-management of Patients with Multiple Sclerosis. Scientific Journal of Nursing, Midwifery and Paramedical Faculty. 2020; 6(1): 58-71. [Persian]
2. Lassmann H, Bradl M. Multiple sclerosis: experimental models and reality. Acta neuropathologica. 2017; 133(2): 223-44. [DOI:10.1007/s00401-016-1631-4]
3. Lassmann H. Multiple sclerosis pathology. Cold Spring Harbor perspectives in medicine. 2018; 8(3): 028936. [DOI:10.1101/cshperspect.a028936]
4. Koutsogeorgou E, Chiesi AM, Leonardi M. Social capital components and social support of persons with multiple sclerosis: a systematic review of the literature from 2000 to 2018. Disability and rehabilitation. 2020; 42(24): 3437-49. [DOI:10.1080/09638288.2019.1597182]
5. Chiurchiù V, van der Stelt M, Centonze D, Maccarrone M. The endocannabinoid system and its therapeutic exploitation in multiple sclerosis: clues for other neuroinflammatory diseases. Progress in neurobiology. 2018; 160: 82-100. [DOI:10.1016/j.pneurobio.2017.10.007]
6. Giacoppo S, Bramanti P, Mazzon E. Sativex in the management of multiple sclerosis-related spasticity: an overview of the last decade of clinical evaluation. Multiple sclerosis and related disorders. 2017; 17(1): 22-31. [DOI:10.1016/j.msard.2017.06.015]
7. Koch-Henriksen N, Thygesen LC, Stenager E, Laursen B, Magyari M. Incidence of MS has increased markedly over six decades in Denmark particularly with late onset and in women. Neurology. 2018; 90(22): 1954-63. [DOI:10.1212/WNL.0000000000005612]
8. Wendebourg MJ, Heesen C, Finlayson M, Meyer B, Pöttgen J, Köpke S. Patient education for people with multiple sclerosis-associated fatigue: a systematic review. PLoS One. 2017; 12(3): 0173025. [DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0173025]
9. Benedict RHB, Wahling E, Rohit B. Predicting quality of life in multiple sclerosis: for physical disability, fatigue, cognition, mood disorder, personality, and behavior change, Journal of Neurological Science. 2010; 231(1): 29-34. [DOI:10.1016/j.jns.2004.12.009]
10. Mitchell AJ, Bentio-Leon J, Gonzalez JM, Rivera-Navarro J. Quality of life and its assessment in multiple sclerosis: integrating psychological components of wellbeing. Lancet Neural. 2005; 1(4): 556-66. [DOI:10.1016/S1474-4422(05)70166-6]
11. Beiske AG, Naess H, Aarseth JH, Anderson D, Elovaara I. Health related quality of life in secondary progressive MS, Mult Scler. 2007; 13(3): 386-92. [DOI:10.1177/13524585070130030101]
12. Pittock SJ, Mayr WT, McClelland RL, Quality of life is favorable for most patients with multiple sclerosis: a populationbased cohort study. Arch Eurol. 2004; 61(5): 679-86. [DOI:10.1001/archneur.61.5.679]
13. Burnett M, Sheard I, St Clair-Thompson H. The prevalence of compassion fatigue, compassion satisfaction and perceived stress, and their relationships with mental toughness, individual differences and number of self-care actions in a UK police force. Police Practice and Research. 2020; 21(4): 383-400. [DOI:10.1080/15614263.2019.1617144]
14. Carleton R, Afifi T, Taillieu T, Turner S, Mason J, Ricciardelli R, Griffiths C. Assessing the relative impact of diverse stressors among public safety personnel. International Journal of. Environmental Research Public Health. 2020; 17(4): 1234. [DOI:10.3390/ijerph17041234]
15. Heiydari S, Salahshorian A, Rafie F, Hoseini F. Correlation of perceived social support and size of social network with quality of life dimension in cancer patients. FEYZ. 2008; 12(2): 15-22. [Persian]
16. Prutskova E. Social vs. Individual Centrality of Religiosity: Research in Religious and Non-Religious Settings in Russia. Religions. 2021; 12(15): 1-18. [DOI:10.3390/rel12010015]
17. Lee E-H, Chung BY, Park HB, Chun KH. Relationships of mood disturbance and social support to symptom experience in Korean women with breast cancer. Journal of pain and symptom management. 2004; 27(5): 425-33. [DOI:10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2003.10.007]
18. Schwartz C, Frohner R. Contribution of demographic, medical, and social support variables in predicting the mental health dimension of quality of life among people with multiple sclerosis. Health & Social Work. 2018; 30(3): 203-12. [DOI:10.1093/hsw/30.3.203]
19. Rosen RC. Assessment of female sexual dysfunction: review of validated methods. Fertility and sterility. 2002; 77(1): 89-93. [DOI:10.1016/S0015-0282(02)02966-7]
20. Cordeau D, Courtois F. Sexual disorders in women with MS: assessment and management. Annals of physical and rehabilitation medicine. 2014; 57(5):337-47. [DOI:10.1016/j.rehab.2014.05.008]
21. Seçıl Y, Yetımalar Y, Gedizlioğlu M, Arpaci E, Tokuçoğlu F, İnceoğlu Kendir A, Başoğlu M, Ertekin C. Sexual dysfunction and sympathetic skin response recorded from the genital region in women with multiple sclerosis. Multiple Sclerosis Journal. 2007; 13(6): 742-48. [DOI:10.1177/1352458506073647]
22. Gava G, Visconti M, Salvi F, Bartolomei I, Seracchioli R, Meriggiola MC. Prevalence and psychopathological determinants of sexual dysfunction and related distress in women with and without multiple sclerosis. The journal of sexual medicine. 2019; 16(6):833-42. [DOI:10.1016/j.jsxm.2019.03.011]
23. Barasa E, Mbau R, Gilson L. What is resilience and how can it be nurtured? A systematic review of empirical literature on organizational resilience. International Journal of Health Policy and Management. 2018; 7(6):491. [DOI:10.15171/ijhpm.2018.06]
24. Cai H, Lam NS, Qiang Y, Zou L, Correll RM, Mihunov V. A synthesis of disaster resilience measurement methods and indices. International journal of disaster risk reduction. 2018; 31(1): 844-55. [DOI:10.1016/j.ijdrr.2018.07.015]
25. Cutter S. The Landscape of Disaster Resilience Indicators in the USA. Natural Hazards. 2016; 80(2): 741-58. [DOI:10.1007/s11069-015-1993-2]
26. Mikaeli N, Mokhtarpour E, Moesmi S. The Role of Perceived Social Support, Coping Strategies and Resilience in Predicting the Quality of Life of Patients with Multiple Sclerosis. Journal of New Findings in Psychology. 2012; 7(23): 5-17. [Persian]
27. Hakiminya B, Poorafkari N, Ghafari D. Factors Affecting Quality of Life with Emphasis On Social Intelligence and Social Health (The Case of Kermanshah City). Journal of Applied Sociology. 2017; 28(2): 163-78. [Persian]
28. Bavazin F, Sepahvandi M A. Investigating the relationship between social support components and social and mental health among the elderly in Khorramabad. Nurs Midwifery J. 2018; 15(12): 931-38. [Persian]
29. Zennozian S, Gharaei B, Yazdannoost R. The effectiveness of problem solving training in changing students' coping strategies. Faculty of Psychology, University of Tabriz. 2010; 5(20): 20-29. [Persian]
30. Montejo AL, Rico-Villademoros F. Psychometric properties of the Psychotropic-Related Sexual Dysfunction Questionnaire (PRSexDQSALSEX) in patients with schizophrenia and other psychotic disorders. J Sex Marital Ther. 2008; 34(3): 227-39. [DOI:10.1080/00926230701866125]
31. Diener E, Heintzelman S, Kushlev Tay L, Wirtz D, Lutes L, Oishi S. Findings all psychologists should know from the new science on subjective well-being. Canadian Psychology psychologiecanadienn. 2017; 58(8): 87-96. [DOI:10.1037/cap0000063]
32. SanagouyeMoharer Gh, Raisi M, Ahmadi Moghaddam FS. Relationship between Religious Coping Styles and Quality of Life in HIV-Positive Patients. Religion and Health. 2017; 5(2): 58-67
33. Samadi Tari M, Jahangir P. Forecasts quality of life based on the maladaptive schema and coping strategies in M.S patient. Rooyesh. 2018; 7(7): 207-18. [Persian]
34. Nedaei A, Paghoosh A, Sadeghi-Hosnijeh A. Relationship between Coping Strategies and Quality of Life: Mediating Role of Cognitive Emotion Regulation Skills. Journal of Clinical Psychology. 2016; 4(32): 35-48.
35. Kaur H, Kaur H & Venkateashan M. Factors determining family support and quality of life of elderly population. International Journal of Medical Science and Public Health. 2015; 4(8): 1049-53. [DOI:10.5455/ijmsph.2015.21012015220]
36. Bahri L, Dehghan Menshadi M, Dehghan Menshadi Z. Investigating the role of resiliency prediction and social support in mental health of parents with blind and deaf children. Exceptional Education. 2014; 1(1): 5-12. [Persian]
37. Farahani A, Yarmohammadian A, Malekpour M, Abedi A. Relationship between Self-Handicapping and Social Supports with Quality of Life in Blind Individuals. MEJDS. 2018; 8(73): 1-7.
38. Park Y, Kim H, Chang S, Kang H, Chun S. Sexuality and related factors of postmenopausal Korean women. Taehan Kanho Hakhoe Chi. 2016; 33(4): 457-63. [DOI:10.4040/jkan.2003.33.4.457]
39. Cabral P, Canario A, Spyrides M, Uchoa S, Eleuterio J, Amaral R. Influence of menopausal symptoms on sexual function in middle-aged women. Rev Bras Ginecol Obstet. 2017; 34(7): 329-34 [DOI:10.1590/S0100-72032012000700007]
40. Abedi G, Darvari S H, Nadighara A, Rostami F. The Relationship between Quality of Life and Marriage Satisfaction in Infertile Couples Using Path Analysis. J Mazandaran Univ Med Sci. 2014; 24 (117): 184-93. [Persian]
| Rights and permissions | |
 |
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. |
