Volume 6, Issue 1 ( Summer 2020)
SJNMP 2020, 6(1): 95-105 |
Back to browse issues page
Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
Sajjadi M, Soltani M, BasiriMoghaddam M, Moghbel M. Comparing the effect of online simulator with lecture training on nursing students' satisfaction and performance in mechanical ventilation issues. SJNMP 2020; 6 (1) :95-105
URL: http://sjnmp.muk.ac.ir/article-1-300-en.html
URL: http://sjnmp.muk.ac.ir/article-1-300-en.html
1- Nursing and Midwifery College, Gonabad University of Medical Sciences
2- Paramedical College, Birjand University of Medical Sciences
3- Razi Hospital, Birjand University of Medical Sciences , mmoghbel56@gmail.com
2- Paramedical College, Birjand University of Medical Sciences
3- Razi Hospital, Birjand University of Medical Sciences , mmoghbel56@gmail.com
Abstract: (2471 Views)
Background & Aim: Nursing students' education about mechanical ventilation issues is very important in preventing unwanted and risky complications due to improper use of ventilator for patients. Therefore, this study aimed to compare the effect of online simulator with lecture training on students' satisfaction and performance in mechanical ventilation.
Materials & Methods: This quasi- experimental study with two groups design was conducted in 2019 on 48 nursing students of 7 semester affiliated with nursing and midwifery college of Birjand University of Medical Sciences. Samples were selected by convenience method and divided into two groups by blocking method. Data collection tools included demographic information form, teacher dignity questionnaire and performance evaluation checklist. The collected data were analyzed by SPSS software version 22 and descriptive and inferential statistics such as Chi-square, Wilcoxon, independent t-test and Mann-Whitney at the significant level less than 0.05.
Results: The results showed that the online simulator group after the intervention had higher satisfaction score and 10 days after the intervention had higher performance score than the lecture group (P <0.001). Also, 10 days after the intervention, the average duration of scenario implementation in the online simulator group was significantly less than the lecture group (P = 0.01).
Materials & Methods: This quasi- experimental study with two groups design was conducted in 2019 on 48 nursing students of 7 semester affiliated with nursing and midwifery college of Birjand University of Medical Sciences. Samples were selected by convenience method and divided into two groups by blocking method. Data collection tools included demographic information form, teacher dignity questionnaire and performance evaluation checklist. The collected data were analyzed by SPSS software version 22 and descriptive and inferential statistics such as Chi-square, Wilcoxon, independent t-test and Mann-Whitney at the significant level less than 0.05.
Results: The results showed that the online simulator group after the intervention had higher satisfaction score and 10 days after the intervention had higher performance score than the lecture group (P <0.001). Also, 10 days after the intervention, the average duration of scenario implementation in the online simulator group was significantly less than the lecture group (P = 0.01).
Conclusion: Based on the findings of the present study, the use of an online simulator can be considered as a new method for training mechanical ventilation.
Keywords: Mechanical ventilation, Nursing student, Performance, Satisfaction, Lecture, Online simulator
Type of Study: Research |
Subject:
General
Received: 2020/01/10 | Revised: 2020/06/19 | Accepted: 2020/03/21 | Published: 2020/06/30 | ePublished: 2020/06/30
Received: 2020/01/10 | Revised: 2020/06/19 | Accepted: 2020/03/21 | Published: 2020/06/30 | ePublished: 2020/06/30
References
1. Olafson K, Ramsey C, Yogendran M, Fransoo R, Chrusch C, Forget E, Garland A. Surge Capacity:Analysis of Census Fluctuations to Estimate the Number of Intensive Care Unit Beds Needed Health Serv res. 2015; 50(1):237-255 [DOI:10.1111/1475-6773.12209]
2. Geravandi S, Soltani F, Mohammadi M, Alizadeh R. The effect of education on the nursing care quality of patients who are under mechanical ventilation in ICU ward. Data Brief. 2018; 16(2):822-827. [DOI:10.1016/j.dib.2017.11.090]
3. Jean-Louis Vincent. Critical care - where have we been and where are we going? Crit Care. 2013;17(1): 6-11. [DOI:10.1186/cc11500]
4. Saad Mohammad A. Impact of in-Service Training Program for Nurses on Nursing Management for Children with Pneumonia Under Mechanical Ventilation at Ahmad Gasim Hospital. Am J Clinic Neuro Neuros. 2015; 1(2): 60-67.
5. Nazir I Lone, Timothy S. Prolonged mechanical ventilation in critically ill patients: epidemiology, outcomes and modelling the potential cost consequences of establishing a regional weaning unit. Crit Care. 2011; 15(102):3-11. [DOI:10.1186/cc10117]
6. Yazdannik AR, Salmani F, Irajpour AR, Abasi S. Effect of the Nurse-directed Weaning Readiness Assessment on the Duration of Mechanical Ventilation: A Randomized Clinical Trial. Qom Univ Med Sci Journal. 2013; 7(4):89-94. [In Persian]
7. Yee J, Fuenning C, George R, Hejal R, aines N, Dunn D, Gothard D, Ahmed R. Mechanical Ventilation Boot Camp: A Simulation-Based Pilot Study. Crit Care Res Pract.2016; 3(1): 161-182. [DOI:10.1155/2016/4670672]
8. Gattinoni1 L, John J, Collino F, Maiolo G, Rapetti F, Tonetti T, Vasques F, Quinte1 M. The future of mechanical ventilation: lessons from the present and the past. Crit Care: 2017; 21(183). [DOI:10.1186/s13054-017-1750-x]
9. Mogharab M, Nateghi K. Effects of lecture and team member teaching design on nursing students' learning and academic motivation. Mod Care J. 2014; 10(3):173-182. [In Persian]
10. Rahnavard Z, Ahmadinezhad Abkenar A, Abbas M. The Effect of Clinical Collaborative Model on the Outcome of Clinical Education of Nursing Students, Faculty of Nursing and Midwifery. Hayat.2010; 15(1):61-70. [In Persian]
11. Mahmoud M. Practical Learning and Theory-Practic Gap as Perceived by Nursing Students. Inter J Cur Res. 2014. 6(2):5083-5093
12. Salimi T, Karimi H , Shahbazi L, Studying the Clinical Skills of Senior Nursing Students in the Departments Critical Care. JSSU. 2004; (13) 3: 60-66. [In Persian]
13. Nakayama N, Arakawa N, Ejiri H, Matsuda R, Makino T. Heart rate variability can clarify students' level of stress during nursing simulation. PLoS ONE.2018; 13(4):12-15. [DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0195280]
14. Nowroozi HM, Mohsenizadeh SM, Jafari Sani H, Ebrahim zadeh S. The Effect of Teaching Using a Blend of Collaborative and Mastery of Learning Models, on Learning of Vital Signs: An Experiment on Nursing and Operation Room Students of Mashhad University of Medical Sciences. IJME. 2011; 11(5):541-553. [In Persian]
15. Sadeghi R, Sedaghat M, Sha Ahmad F. Comparison of the effect of lecture and blended teaching methods on students' learning and Satisfaction. J Adv Med Educ Prof.2014; 2(4):146-149.
16. Qayumi K, Pachev G, Zheng B, Ziv A, Koval V. Badiei S, Cheng A. Status of Simulation in Health care Education: an international surve. AMEP.2014; 5(2):246-457. [DOI:10.2147/AMEP.S65451]
17. Norman J. Systematic Review of the Literature on Simulation in Nursing Education. ABNF J. 2012; 23 (2): 24-27.
18. Zaghry Tafreshhi M, Rasooli M, Sajjadi M. Simulation in nursing education. IJME. 2012;12 (11):888-894. [In Persian]
19. Flechelles D, Hernert P, Emeriaud G, Zaglam N, Cheriet F, Jouve PH. Simulations for Mechanical Ventilation in Children. Hindawi Publishing Corporation. Crit Care Res Pract. 2013; 15(2):20-28 [DOI:10.1155/2013/943281]
20. Keegan R, Henderson T. Use of the virtual ventilator, a screen-based computer simulation, to teach the principles of mechanical ventilation. JVME .2009; 36(4) :436-443. [DOI:10.3138/jvme.36.4.436]
21. Haghani F, Ehsani M, Jafari S. Simulation. JMED. 2014; 11(2):272-279. [In Persian]
22. Ortiz Figueroa F, Moftakha Y, Dobbins A, Khan R, Dasgupta R, Blanda R, Marchand T, Ahmed R. Mechanical Ventilation Boot Camp: A Simulation-Based Pilot Study. Cureus. 2016; 8(1): 463-470. [DOI:10.7759/cureus.463]
23. Hashemi J, Jamshidian S, Haghani F. Comparing the effects of "lecture" and "simulated patient" teaching methods on promoting the knowledge and performance of healthcare providers. IJME. 2017; 17 :145-156. [In Persian]
24. Tabatabaeian M, Kordi M, Dadgar S, Esmaily H, Khadivzadeh T. Comparison of the Effects of Simulation-Based Training, Compilation Training, and Lectures on the Cognitive Skills of Midwives in the Management of Preeclampsia and Eclampsia. JOGI. 2018; 21 (2): 30-39. [In Persian]
25. Love RR. Methods for Increasing Active Medical Student Participation in their own Learning: Experiencewith a Single 30-hour Course for Preclinical Students. J Cancer Educ 1990; 5(1): 33-6. [DOI:10.1080/08858199009528032]
26. Maddry JK, Varney SM, Sessions D, Heard K, Thaxton RE, Ganem VJ, Zarzabal LA, Bebarta VS. A comparison of simulation-based education versus lecture-based instruction for toxicology training in emergency medicine residents. J Med Toxicol. 2014; 10(4):364-368. [DOI:10.1007/s13181-014-0401-8]
27. Nateghi Zavareh K. Effects of lecture and team member teaching design on nursing students' learning and academic motivation [Nursing dissertation]. Nursing and Midwifery College: Birjand University of Medical Sciences; 2013.
28. Andeson M, Hetzel S, Diaz D.Simulation in Advanced Practice Education. Clin Simul Nurs.2019; 26: 81-85. [DOI:10.1016/j.ecns.2018.10.011]
29. Warren J, Luctkar M, Christina F, Lukewich J. A Systematic review of the effectiveness of simulation-based education on satisfaction and learning outcomes in nurse practitioner programs. Nurse Educ Today. 2016.3(12):11-20.
30. Najafi M, Eteraf-Oskouei T. Pharmacy Students' Attitude in Tabriz University of Medical Sciences toward Using Computerized Simulations in Teaching. IJME. 2011; 11 (4): 308-317. [In Persian]
31. Corbridge S, Robinson P, Tiffen J, Corbridge T. Online Learning versus Simulation for Teaching Principles of Mechanical Ventilation to Nurse Practitioner Students. IJNES; 2010; 7(1):12-19. [DOI:10.2202/1548-923X.1976]
32. Keung LP, Eric CW, Elaine CY, Lok CK, Henry WY, Wah KC. Comparing Clinical Learning Effectiveness among Lecture-Based Training, Simulation-based Training and Training using Animal Tissue Models. J Med Edu. 2018;17(1): 19-24.
33. Rauen CA. Simulation as a Teaching Strategy for Nursing Education and Orientation in Cardiac Surgery. Crit Care Nurs. 2004;24(3): 46-51. [DOI:10.4037/ccn2004.24.3.46]
34. Nikravan-Mofrad M, Zohari Anboohi S. The effect of simulation training method on enabling student nurses in advanced pre-hospital operation. ICNS. 2013; 4 (1): 32-38. [In Persian]
35. Wright A, Moss P, M. Dennis D, Harrold M, Levy S, Anne L. Furness and Alan Reubenson. The influence of a full-time, immersive simulation-based clinical placement on physiotherapy student confidence during the transition to clinical practice. Adv Simul. 2018; 3(3), 24-30. [DOI:10.1186/s41077-018-0062-9]
36. Rabin DL, Boekeloo BO, Marx ES, Bowman MA, Russell NK, Willis AG. Improving office-based physicians' prevention practices for sexually transmitted diseases. Ann Intern Med. 1994; 121(7): 513-9. [DOI:10.7326/0003-4819-121-7-199410010-00007]
37. Dillard N, Sideras S, Ryan M, Carlton KH, Lasater K, Siktberg L. A collaborative project to apply and evaluate the clinical judgment model through simulation. Nurs Educ Perspect. 2009; 30(2): 99-104
Send email to the article author
| Rights and permissions | |
 |
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. |
