Volume 10, Issue 3 (4-2025)
SJNMP 2025, 10(3): 373-388 |
Back to browse issues page
Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
Khoshfetrat M, Keykha A, Zahra D S, Beirami A. Investigating the Effect of Empowerment-Based Education and Treatment on Improving Psychological Well-Being and Quality of Life in Patients with Spinal Cord Injury. SJNMP 2025; 10 (3) :373-388
URL: http://sjnmp.muk.ac.ir/article-1-663-en.html
URL: http://sjnmp.muk.ac.ir/article-1-663-en.html
1- Zahedan University of Medical Sciences
2- Zahedan University of Medical Sciences ,aliakbar.keykha@gmail.com
3- Islamic Azad University, Bandar Abbas Branch
4- slamic Azad University, Bandar Abbas Branch
2- Zahedan University of Medical Sciences ,
3- Islamic Azad University, Bandar Abbas Branch
4- slamic Azad University, Bandar Abbas Branch
Abstract: (28 Views)
Background & Aim: Spinal cord injuries cause many physical and psychological complications for patients and lead to a decrease in their psychological well-being and quality of life. These patients require psychological interventions in addition to medical treatments to overcome these problems. This study investigated the effect of empowerment-based education and treatment improves psychological well-being and quality of life in patients with spinal cord injury.
Materials &Methods: This quasi-experimental study was conducted among 246 patients with spinal cord injuries at the Bandar Abbas Spinal Cord Injury Association between 2023 and 2024. Patients were included through a convenience sampling method and completed a quality-of-life questionnaire. A total of 30 patients who scored below 95 were randomly assigned to three groups of 10: two intervention groups and one control group. After grouping, all patients completed the Riff Psychological Well-Being Questionnaire. The first intervention group received acceptance and commitment therapy, the second group underwent psychological empowerment training, and the control group did not receive any treatment. One month after the intervention, patients in all three groups completed the quality of life and psychological well-being questionnaires again. The data were then analyzed using descriptive statistics and ANCOVA to compare the outcomes (significance level: 0.5).
Results: Per-intervention mean quality of life scores ranged were 76 to 78 in the three groups. Post-intervention, quality of life scores significantly improved in intervention groups 1 (83.4) and 2 (82.1) compared to the control group (76.5) (p = 0.001). Pre-intervention, mean well-being scores were 62-64 in the three groups. Post-intervention, control group well-being was 62.9, while intervention groups one and two scored 76.41 and 82.1 (p = 0.001).
Conclusion: Acceptance and commitment therapy and psychological empowerment training lead to improved quality of life and psychological well-being of patients with spinal cord injury.
Materials &Methods: This quasi-experimental study was conducted among 246 patients with spinal cord injuries at the Bandar Abbas Spinal Cord Injury Association between 2023 and 2024. Patients were included through a convenience sampling method and completed a quality-of-life questionnaire. A total of 30 patients who scored below 95 were randomly assigned to three groups of 10: two intervention groups and one control group. After grouping, all patients completed the Riff Psychological Well-Being Questionnaire. The first intervention group received acceptance and commitment therapy, the second group underwent psychological empowerment training, and the control group did not receive any treatment. One month after the intervention, patients in all three groups completed the quality of life and psychological well-being questionnaires again. The data were then analyzed using descriptive statistics and ANCOVA to compare the outcomes (significance level: 0.5).
Results: Per-intervention mean quality of life scores ranged were 76 to 78 in the three groups. Post-intervention, quality of life scores significantly improved in intervention groups 1 (83.4) and 2 (82.1) compared to the control group (76.5) (p = 0.001). Pre-intervention, mean well-being scores were 62-64 in the three groups. Post-intervention, control group well-being was 62.9, while intervention groups one and two scored 76.41 and 82.1 (p = 0.001).
Conclusion: Acceptance and commitment therapy and psychological empowerment training lead to improved quality of life and psychological well-being of patients with spinal cord injury.
Keywords: Spinal Cord Injury, Quality of Life, Psychological Well-being, Acceptance and Commitment Therapy, Psychological Empowerment
Type of Study: Research |
Subject:
Special
Received: 2025/01/26 | Revised: 2025/09/2 | Accepted: 2025/02/25 | Published: 2025/04/9 | ePublished: 2025/04/9
Received: 2025/01/26 | Revised: 2025/09/2 | Accepted: 2025/02/25 | Published: 2025/04/9 | ePublished: 2025/04/9
References
1. Hu X, Xu W, Ren Y, Wang Z, He X, Huang R, et al. Spinal cord injury: molecular mechanisms and therapeutic interventions. Signal Transduct Target Ther. 2023;8(1):245. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41392-023-01477-6
2. Razzaghi V, Ostadhashemi L, Arshi M, Sabzi Khoshnami M. Exploring the Facilitators and Barriers of Social Integration of Patients with Spinal Cord Injuries in Rofeideh Rehabilitation Hospital: A Qualitative Study. Archives of Rehabilitation. 2023;23(4):482-501.https://doi.org/10.32598/RJ.23.4.3398.1
3. Barbiellini Amidei C, Salmaso L, Bellio S, Saia M. Epidemiology of traumatic spinal cord injury: a large population-based study. Spinal Cord. 2022;60(9):812-9. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41393-022-00795-w
4. Tulsky DS, Kisala PA, Victorson D, Tate DG, Heinemann AW, Charlifue S, et al. Overview of the Spinal Cord Injury--Quality of Life (SCI-QOL) measurement system. J Spinal Cord Med. 2015;38(3):257-69.
5. Burke D, Lennon O, Fullen BM. Quality of life after spinal cord injury: The impact of pain. Eur J Pain. 2018;22(9):1662-72
6. Hsieh S, De Simone A, Dyson-Hudson T, O'Neill J, Botticello A, Chen A, et al. Benefits and barriers to return to education and relationship to quality of life for people living with spinal cord injury: Results of a mixed methods study. J Spinal Cord Med. 2025;48(2):327-37. https://doi.org/10.1080/10790268.2023.2294520
7. deRoon-Cassini TA, de St Aubin E, Valvano A, Hastings J, Horn P. Psychological well-being after spinal cord injury: perception of loss and meaning making. Rehabil Psychol. 2009;54(3):306-14.
8. Carrard V, Kunz S, Peter C. Mental health, quality of life, self-efficacy, and social support of individuals living with spinal cord injury in Switzerland compared to that of the general population. Spinal Cord. 2021;59(4):398-409.https://doi.org/10.1038/s41393-020-00582-5
9. Geyh S, Nick E, Stirnimann D, Ehrat S, Müller R, Michel F. Biopsychosocial outcomes in individuals with and without spinal cord injury: a Swiss comparative study. Spinal Cord. 2012;50(8):614-22.
10. Jafari H, Sajjadian I, Nikandish Z. Effectiveness of Quality of Life Therapy on Life Satisfaction, Positive Affect, and Aggression in Patients with Spinal Cord Injuries. Quarterly Journal of Social Work. 2023;12(3):5-16. [Persian]
11. Ghanei Gheshlagh R, Mohammadnejad E, Shakeri B, Sohrabi R, Baghi V, Parizad N. Prevalence of depression among patients with spinal cord injury in iran: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Nursing and Midwifery Journal. 2023;21(4):289-98. https://doi.org/10.61186/unmf.21.4.289. [Persian]
12. Post M, van Leeuwen CM. Psychosocial issues in spinal cord injury: a review. Spinal cord. 2012;50(5):382-9
13. Rattanasuk D, Khuwatsamrit K. Causal Model of Psychological Empowerment Among People with Spinal Cord Injury in Thailand. Orthop Nurs. 2021;40(3):136-43. https://doi.org/10.1097/NOR.0000000000000754
14. Gholami A, Jahromi LM, Zarei E, Dehghan A. Application of WHOQOL-BREF in Measuring Quality of Life in Health-Care Staff. Int J Prev Med. 2013;4(7):809-17.
15. [Available from: https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/WHOQOL-BREF.
16. Mahmoudi Nodezh M, Amirfakhraei A, Samavi A. Efficacy Effectiveness of Acceptance and Commitment Therapy (ACT) on the Life Quality and Resilience of Those Recuperated from Recovered Covid-19 Patients. Journal of Applied Psychological Research. 2022;13(4):125-38.
17. Nejat S, Montazeri A, Holakouie Naieni K, Mohammad K, Majdzadeh SR. The world health organization quality of life (whoqol-bref) questionnaire: translation and validation study of the iranian version. journal of school of public health and institute of public health research. 2006;4(4):1-12. [Persian]
18. Ryff CD. Happiness is everything, or is it? Explorations on the meaning of psychological well-being. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 1998;57(6):1069-81. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.57.6.1069
19. Bayani AA, Kouchaki A, Bayani A. Reliability and validity of Ryff's psychological well-being scales. 2008.
20. Michaeli Manee F. The Study of Ryff Psychological Well-being Scale Factorial Structure between Urmia University Students. Journal of Modern Psychological Researches. 2010;5(18):143-65.
21. Shahandeh H, Wameghi R, Hatamizadeh N, Kazemnejad A. Quality of life among people with spinal cord injuries. Journal of School of Public Health and Institute of Public Health Research. 2005;3(3):1-8.
22. Cardile D, Calderone A, De Luca R, Corallo F, Quartarone A, Calabrò RS. The Quality of Life in Patients with Spinal Cord Injury: Assessment and Rehabilitation. J Clin Med. 2024;13(6). https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm13061820
23. Karimi Moonaghi H, Ramezani M, Amini S, Khodadadi Hosseini BM, Keykha A. Spiritual Challenges of Family Caregivers of Patients in a Vegetative State: A Qualitative Content Analysis. Journal of Qualitative Research in Health Sciences. 2024;13(3):124-30. https://doi.org/10.34172/jqr.2024.18
24. Gurcay E, Bal A, Eksioglu E, Cakci A. Quality of life in patients with spinal cord injury. Int J Rehabil Res. 2010;33(4):356-8.
25. Valizadeh H, Ahmadi V. The Effectiveness of Acceptance and Commitment-Based Therapy on the Quality of Life and Death Anxiety in the Elderly. Aging Psychology. 2021;7(2):166-53.
26. Morshedi M, Davarniya R, Zahrakar K, Mahmudi M, Shakarami M. The effectiveness of acceptance and commitment therapy (act) on reducing couple burnout of couples. iranian journal of nursing research. 2016;10(4):76-87. [Persian]
27. Zare F, Manshaei G, Keshti Arai N. Efficiency of Psychological Empowerment Training on Self-Worth and Psychological Capitals in Family-Headed Women. Journal of Applied Psychological Research. 2023;14(1):195-210.
28. Rattanasuk D, Khuwatsamrit K. Causal model of psychological empowerment among people with spinal cord injury in thailand. orthopaedic Nursing. 2021;40(3). https://doi.org/10.1097/NOR.0000000000000754
29. Houlihan BV, Everhart-Skeels S, Gutnick D, Pernigotti D, Zazula J, Brody M, et al. Empowering adults with chronic spinal cord injury to prevent secondary conditions. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2016;97(10):1687-95.e5 .
30. Abedini E, Ghanbari-Hashem-Abadi, B.A, Talebian-Sharif, J. Effectiveness of group therapy based on hope approach on hope and depression in women with multiple sclerosis. Journal of Clinical Psychology. 2016;8(2):1-11.
31. karimivakil A, Shafiabadi A, farahbakhsh k, younesi j. Effectiveness of psychological empowerment training program based on individual psychology Adler's theory on female-headed household's learned helplessness. Counseling Culture and Psycotherapy. 2017;8(31):23-51.
32. Bastami A, Pashaii Sabet F, Qomarverdi S, Nikbakht Nasraabadi A. Review study of requirements for a model for home-based rehabilitation of traumatic spinal cord injury. Iranian Journal of Nursing Research. 2017;12(2):45-9. [persian]
Send email to the article author
| Rights and permissions | |
 |
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. |
